Division by Zero: What Does it Mean?

Ahmed Ismail
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Good morning all
I want to know why 0 divide anything = zero, and why division by zero is undefined?

regards

Blog Insight: Division by zero
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Saying a/b= c means that a= bc. If a/0= c then a= 0c. But 0 times any number is 0- the equation a= 0c for a not equal to 0 is impossible so a/0= c is also impossible. If a= 0, there's a different problem. 0/0= c becomes 0= 0c which true no matter what c is! We still are unable to say that 0/c is any particular number.

Many math textbooks use the term "undefined" for a/0 when a is not zero and "undetermined" for 0/0 because of that difference.
 
1. There is no such SEPARATE thing called "division" as you've learned it(contrary to school teaching).
What you DO have, is the following:
Given any non-zero real number "a", there exists another number, that we have given the name "(1/a)", that has the property when multiplied with "a" yields the number 1, that is: a*(1/a)=1.
We can prove that for any particular number "a", the number "(1/a)" is UNIQUE, so the identity a*(1/a)=1 can be said to DEFINE (1/a) (just like we DEFINE "2" to be the number so that 1+1=2, really)

Whenever we multiply (1/a) with some other number, say b, that is we form the product b*(1/a), we find this notation so cumbersome so that in short hand, we introduce the notation b/a=b*(1/a).

Now, we can prove that whenever we multiply a number with 0, then we get 0, so for any "a", we have 0/a=0*(1/a)=0, providing the answer to your first question.

The answer to your second question is also contained here, because if 0*anything=0, then, since 1 isn't 0, then there CAN'T exist a number (1/0) having the property 0*(1/0)=1 (remember I required that a had to be non-zero earlier?)

This essentially answers your questions.

2. What you compute at school, and calling the "operation of division" is quite simply how to find the decimal representation of the fraction b/a.

This is entirely analogous to that what you call "operation of addition", where you merely are requested to find the decimal (or, rather denary) representation of, say, the number 23+49
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top