DNA-functionalized nanoparticles

  • Thread starter Thread starter superwolf
  • Start date Start date
superwolf
Messages
179
Reaction score
0
What do you understand by "the aggregation of DNA-functionalized nanoparticles"? Is it about how to make hybrid particles like DNA-nanogold, or is it about the particles' tendency to self assembly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like typical nanotech to me.

By which I define 'nanotech' as "a branch of science dedicated to turning ordinary physical chemistry into fantastic-sounding buzzwords, producing large research grants in the process".
 
It think its neither.
Self-aggregation in this context probably just means that particles tend to clump together (randomly, self-assembly sort of implies some sort of structure) which would presumably would be a major problem when trying to analyze them.

Btw, although I agree that the nanotech area is ripe with buzzwords this is actually one example where the word actually means something. "Functionalized nanoparticles" are simply nanoparticles with some sort of property (they can e.g be magnetic) that makes them easy to find/analyze that have been functionalized; in this example coated with a substance that binds to DNA. The neat thing about this is that you can disperse them in whatever you are are trying to analyze (they can even be injected) and they will then to the DNA (or whatever); the sample can then by analyzed using a magnetic sensor.

It it a very promising technology and I even think it is already in practical use.
 
Just for the sake of clarity, where did you come across this phrase? If you could, give us a link to the article, or post a quote of the entire paragraph in which the phrase was used (getting proper credit to the author, of course). Putting it in context might help.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top