Do All Electrons in a Molecular Orbital Share the Same Magnetic Quantum Number?

grunf
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have one question about wave functions and molecular orbitals (MO). In the computational quantum chemistry scientists often use Linear Combination Atomic Orbitals (LCAO) to construct MO.

\varphi_{i\lambda\alpha}(\vec{r})=<br /> \sum\limits_{p=1}^{N}\chi_{p\lambda\alpha}(\vec{r})<br /> C_{i\lambda p},
where
\chi_{p\lambda\alpha}(\vec{r})=2^{-1/2}<br /> \left[\chi_{n_{\lambda p} l_{\lambda p}m_{\lambda\alpha}}(\vec{r}_{A})<br /> +\sigma_{\lambda}\chi_{n_{\lambda p} l_{\lambda p}m_{\lambda\alpha}}(\vec{r}_{B})\right].

Here \chi_{n_{\lambda p} l_{\lambda p}m_{\lambda\alpha}}(\vec{r}_{J}) (J=A,B) are the usual Slater-type functions (STF-s) centered on A and B, respectively. \lambda is the symmetry species (\textrm{for example } \sigma or \pi) and \alpha (for example g or u) is the subspecies of symmetry \lambda.

Note, that in the above sum's there is no dependence m_{\lambda\alpha}
from p!?

The question is: Does it means that in some MO (\sigma or \pi, for example) all electrons must have the same magnetic quantum number? Why is that?
Is there some symmetry, some rule, some law or some common property for all electrons in the same MO.

In some papers I have found that for LCAO molecule N_{2} all electrons have
m=0 while in the case of molecule O_{2} m=1. Why is that? Is it possible that some electrons have m=-1?

If somebody have any sugestions about this question, I will be very appreciate.

Regards
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have absolutely no idea at all about computational chemistry or STFs I'm afraid... (which I think is what may have put a lot of physicists off trying to answer!)
What I can tell you is that magnetic quantum numbers can range over the integers (-L, L) where L is the orbital quantum number, so yes electrons can have a magnetic moment of minus one. See here for a little more info, or google 'magnetic quantum numbers'.
 
grunf said:
I have one question about wave functions and molecular orbitals (MO). In the computational quantum chemistry scientists often use Linear Combination Atomic Orbitals (LCAO) to construct MO.

\varphi_{i\lambda\alpha}(\vec{r})=<br /> \sum\limits_{p=1}^{N}\chi_{p\lambda\alpha}(\vec{r})<br /> C_{i\lambda p},
where
\chi_{p\lambda\alpha}(\vec{r})=2^{-1/2}<br /> \left[\chi_{n_{\lambda p} l_{\lambda p}m_{\lambda\alpha}}(\vec{r}_{A})<br /> +\sigma_{\lambda}\chi_{n_{\lambda p} l_{\lambda p}m_{\lambda\alpha}}(\vec{r}_{B})\right].

Here \chi_{n_{\lambda p} l_{\lambda p}m_{\lambda\alpha}}(\vec{r}_{J}) (J=A,B) are the usual Slater-type functions (STF-s) centered on A and B, respectively. \lambda is the symmetry species (\textrm{for example } \sigma or \pi) and \alpha (for example g or u) is the subspecies of symmetry \lambda.

Note, that in the above sum's there is no dependence m_{\lambda\alpha}
from p!?

The question is: Does it means that in some MO (\sigma or \pi, for example) all electrons must have the same magnetic quantum number? Why is that?
Is there some symmetry, some rule, some law or some common property for all electrons in the same MO.

In some papers I have found that for LCAO molecule N_{2} all electrons have
m=0

all? really? All fourteen electrons? :wink:

while in the case of molecule O_{2} m=1. Why is that? Is it possible that some electrons have m=-1?

If somebody have any sugestions about this question, I will be very appreciate.

Regards
 
olgranpappy said:
all? really? All fourteen electrons? :wink:

I was quite unaccurate. In this case I was thinking on the electron in the Highest Ocuppied Molecular Orbital (HOMO). My mistake :frown:
 
muppet said:
I have absolutely no idea at all about computational chemistry or STFs I'm afraid... (which I think is what may have put a lot of physicists off trying to answer!)
What I can tell you is that magnetic quantum numbers can range over the integers (-L, L) where L is the orbital quantum number, so yes electrons can have a magnetic moment of minus one. See here for a little more info, or google 'magnetic quantum numbers'.

Thanx for the tips. I already know that. I am sure that is the key in the some molecular symmetries, but I am not sure. I am looking for some rule, law... Thanx again
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top