Do anti-matter particles have a secret agenda to annihilate matter particles?

  • I
  • Thread starter petrushkagoogol
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Particle
In summary, any anti-matter particle in Nature will be annihilated by the first matter particle it encounters, without any kind of superluminal communication between them. This is consistent with the laws of physics, as there is no active seeking out or targeting of particles, but rather interactions based on their movement and external forces.
  • #1
petrushkagoogol
28
4
Any anti-matter particle in Nature seeks out and gets annihilated by the first matter particle it encounters. (always the first).

Is there a kind of superluminal communication between matter anti-matter particle pairs ?

Is this consistent with the laws of physics ?:))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
petrushkagoogol said:
Is there a kind of superluminal communication between matter anti-matter particle pairs ?
No. I am not sure what would make you believe this.
 
  • #3
petrushkagoogol said:
Any anti-matter particle in Nature seeks out and gets annihilated by the first matter particle it encounters. (always the first).
I don't think that a positron can be annihilated by a proton.
 
  • #4
petrushkagoogol said:
the first matter particle it encounters. (always the first).

I am not sure what would make you believe this either.
 
  • #5
petrushkagoogol said:
Any anti-matter particle in Nature seeks out and gets annihilated by the first matter particle it encounters. (always the first).
That is not correct. There's no "seeking out" going on. They're both moving through space on whatever paths they're on and being pushed around by whatever forces happen to be acting on them. If they get close enough they'll interact, just like any other particles moving about.
 

What is "The intelligent particle"?

The intelligent particle is a hypothetical concept in particle physics that suggests the existence of a type of particle that possesses intelligence or consciousness.

What evidence supports the existence of "The intelligent particle"?

Currently, there is no scientific evidence that supports the existence of an intelligent particle. This concept is purely theoretical and has not been observed or detected in any experiments.

How does "The intelligent particle" differ from other particles?

"The intelligent particle" differs from other particles in that it is believed to possess intelligence or consciousness, unlike other particles that only exhibit physical properties such as mass and charge.

What implications would the discovery of "The intelligent particle" have on our understanding of the universe?

If "The intelligent particle" were to be discovered and proven to exist, it would significantly challenge our understanding of the universe and the fundamental laws of physics. It could potentially open up new avenues of research and change our perspective on the nature of reality.

Can "The intelligent particle" be harnessed for practical applications?

As of now, there is no way to harness or utilize "The intelligent particle" for practical purposes. However, if it were to be discovered, it could potentially lead to advancements in technology and artificial intelligence.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
635
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
956
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top