Atoms: Do They Die & Where Does It Lead?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnebgood108
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms
AI Thread Summary
Atoms do not "die" in a conventional sense but can undergo various transformations, such as bonding with other atoms to form molecules or undergoing nuclear decay. In extreme conditions, like those found in stars, atoms can fuse together or split apart, leading to the creation of different elements. Radioactive isotopes can decay into other types of atoms, while proton decay remains a hypothetical concept. Additionally, antimatter exists and can be produced and observed, with interactions between matter and antimatter resulting in energy conversion. Overall, the fate of an atom involves complex interactions rather than a definitive end.
johnebgood108
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
do they just gon spinning? where does it all lead up to? entropy? or someyhing else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "die?"

There's no reason for them to split apart at all, they should remain in their current state. Electrons, due to the nature of Quantum Mechanics, should remain in their respective orbits, and the nucleus should stay bound, unless exposed to extreme conditions, such as the core of a star, where they fuse together.

Some radioactive isotopes decay into different kinds of atoms, too.
 
there's something call proton decay, but it is currently hypothetical and has never been observed
 
Atoms cannot "die" in the normal sense. However I expect you already knew this but didn't know how to word the question. So, what CAN happen to the atom? The most common thing is that it bonds with another atom, or several, to form a molecule by sharing, borrowing, or giving up electrons. Since electrons are considered part of the atom, it isn't the same as it used to be. We also have nuclear decay, where particles in the nucleus are transformed into other particles, ejected completely out, or the nucleus splits into large pieces, with each piece forming a new atom of a different element. Finally there is nuclear fusion where the nuclei of two atoms fuses together to form another one of a different element.
 
Atoms are matter, and made of subatomic particles.

Anti-matter composed of particles of opposite charge is considered possible.

Adding matter to anti-matter would convert the matter (and equivalent anti-matter) to energy.
 
Yngvi said:
Anti-matter composed of particles of opposite charge is considered possible.

Not only is it considered possible, it has been observed. We make antimatter and observe it all the time.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top