Do black holes create antimatter from matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter
AI Thread Summary
Black holes do not convert matter into antimatter; they primarily produce Hawking radiation if the theory holds true. Antimatter is generated in particle accelerators when high-speed particles collide, converting kinetic energy into mass, resulting in equal amounts of matter and antimatter. However, there is a slight asymmetry in this process, leading to a universe predominantly composed of matter. It is believed that any antimatter created in the early universe was annihilated, leaving no significant accumulations of antimatter in the visible universe today. Thus, everything observed is a result of this matter-antimatter asymmetry.
nuby
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
Do black holes convert matter to antimatter? How does antimatter come into 'existence' within a particle accelerator?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
nuby said:
Do black holes convert matter to antimatter?

No, the only thing that Black Holes produce from the material that drops into them is Hawking radiation, if that theory is correct.

nuby said:
How does antimatter come into 'existence' within a particle accelerator?

Particles moving very quickly (near the speed of light) can convert their energy of motion into rest mass energy of new particles when they collide with other particles. So for instance a proton accelerated to high speeds when it rams into another proton can produce a shower of particles whose total mass is much more than the rest mass of the two protons you start with. This is the conversion of energy into mass, the reverse process of turning mass into energy, which occurs in a Nuclear bomb or reactor.

When these new particles are made there are roughly as many matter as anti-matter particles produced although the details depends on the nature of the two particles in the collision, the energy of the collision etc etc. The point is that matter and anti-matter are made equally in the process.

We do think there is a slight asymmetry in this process that leads to the Universe being made mainly of matter rather than anti-matter, but this asymmetry is very slight.
 
Wallace said:
We do think there is a slight asymmetry in this process that leads to the Universe being made mainly of matter rather than anti-matter, but this asymmetry is very slight.

Is this asymmetry small enough that some of the visible universe is still composed of anti-matter? Or, conversely, has all anti-matter in the visible universe been annihilated and everything we see is just the asymmetry?
 
The second option. We are pretty sure that there are no accumulations of anti-matter anywhere (such as say an anti-matter planet, or even as small as an anti-matter grain of dust). As you suggest, we think that when the Universe was first cool enough to form atomic particles, the matter and anti-matter produced annihilated each other in equal amounts leaving only a small amount of matter due to the asymmetry.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top