Do contracting muscles emit electric fields?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the detection of electric fields emitted by the human body, particularly in relation to muscle activity and the use of EMF meters. Users highlight that while the body can influence electromagnetic fields, the readings from EMF meters are often affected by external sources such as AC mains wiring. The conversation also touches on the challenges of detecting muscle-generated electrical signals, emphasizing the distinction between electromyography (EMG) and the broader concept of electromagnetic fields. Overall, the consensus is that the body's contribution to electric fields is minimal compared to external influences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic fields (EMF) and their measurement
  • Familiarity with electromyography (EMG) techniques
  • Knowledge of AC mains wiring and its effects on EMF readings
  • Basic principles of radio frequency transmission and reception
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of electromyography (EMG) and its applications
  • Explore the calibration and characterization of EMF meters for accurate readings
  • Investigate the effects of human proximity on radio frequency signals
  • Learn about electromagnetic hazard assessment methodologies
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for researchers in biomedical engineering, health professionals interested in EMG, and anyone involved in electromagnetic field assessment and safety protocols.

jaketodd
Gold Member
Messages
507
Reaction score
21
I bought an EMF meter that can discriminate to electric fields, and it is highly sensitive to the proximity of my body. What is it in the human body that emits electric fields? Is it muscle activity? Maybe many things in the body? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
People conduct radio energy. They pick it up from one place and retransmit it.
For example, if you are sitting close to a CRT (old TV or oscilloscope) you will be transmitting lots of EM.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: davenn and russ_watters
.Scott said:
People conduct radio energy. They pick it up from one place and retransmit it.
For example, if you are sitting close to a CRT (old TV or oscilloscope) you will be transmitting lots of EM.
We don't do anything different compared to any other bag of saltwater our size... :smile:

jaketodd said:
I bought an EMF meter that can discriminate to electric fields, and it is highly sensitive to the proximity of my body.
Go out into the middle of an open field and try it again. Most likely you will not see anything. If in your test you are in your house near AC Mains wiring, the AC voltage (current) from your parasitic capacitance to that wiring is probably what your EM meter is sensing.
 
Last edited:
Baluncore said:
Detecting muscle noise, EMG, is difficult.
ECG instruments are commonplace and not too high tech. They used to consist of nothing more than sensitive galvanometers, in the past. The electrical activity of the heart is measured by placing electrodes (pads) at a number of places on the torso. They record signals in the order of a few mV but that is very different from a radiated field. Is EMG a different thing, apart from the muscles it looks at?

The OP is referring to an EMF meter which, afaiaa, is for assessing the potential harm from exposure to EM fields. What he's been measuring / detecting will almost certainly be the effect of the presence of his body on the fields that are there anyway. An FM radio can be affected greatly by the presence of a human - either improving or worsening the signal strength, depending, in the same way as wiggling the whip antenna about. The body acts like a piece of metal of similar size and re-radiates signals in the vicinity.

Without knowing about the frequencies involved, it's hard to comment usefully on what he's seeing but there's not much chance of it coming from his body if a simple hand held device can register it.

PS EM Hazard assessment is a bit of a black art and getting relevant and meaningful readings of fields is pretty hard. Not least, the antenna / probe needs to be well calibrated and characterised if the results could be accepted in a court of law when someone claims Industrial Injury!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Delta2
This thread has become a magnet for pseudoscience nonsense posts (which have been deleted). @jaketodd please do the "outstanding in your field" experiment that I suggested. Thank you. Thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K