Do Different Materials with the Same Mass Have the Same Number of Protons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bolbol2054
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Protons
AI Thread Summary
1 kg of iron contains the same number of protons as 1 kg of aluminum, hydrogen, or wood when comparing their atomic structures, but the total mass is defined by the number of protons and neutrons (P + N) in each element. Neutrons have a mass nearly equal to protons, making it feasible to define mass based on these particles. The binding energy in atomic nuclei introduces minimal errors, typically under 1%. Understanding the relationship between mass and atomic composition is crucial for accurate scientific measurements. This discussion highlights the importance of protons and neutrons in defining the mass of different materials.
bolbol2054
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
my question is
Does 1 kg of iron contain the same number of protons as 1kg of aluminium,hydrogen and wood
Can we define mass of matter with no of protons and neutrons it contains?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi bolbol2054! :smile:

A neutron weighs almost exactly the same as a proton, and most elements have more neutrons than protons, so you would have to define mass of matter with the number of protons and neutrons (P + N) it contains.

If you did, it would be pretty accurate …

the errors (due to "binding energy") would be well under 1%: see the tables in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bindin..._experimentally_measured_atom_nuclide_masses" for some detailed figures. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thank you sir
 
don't call me sir!

i'm only a little goldfish! :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top