Do electrons lose mass due to revolving around nucleon?

h20 bear
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Does the nucleon and electron lose mass as a result of the energies they exert in a static state.
The electron constantly uses the electromagnetic force to keep it attracted to the nucleon causing it to revolve around the nucleon. So does it lose mass?

Similarly, does the nucleon lose mass through its use of the nuclear/electromagnetic forces?

Are quantum vibrations of the atoms calculated in it's energy balance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forces don't work that way; it doesn't 'cost' energy to exert a force. Bound electrons don't lose mass. (Actually, they gain relativistic mass due to increased momentum)

Yes, zero-point vibrational energy is taken into account when calculating the total energy of a molecule.
 
This confuses me in regards to Thermodynamics. If an electron and proton are separate and they eventually float together. The electron experiences an increase in speed and thus relativistic mass, won't this be a violation of energy conservation? Where is the loss?
 
No, the electron does not radiate any energy when it is bound to a nucleon, but the electron loses energy in the form of radiating energy (a 912 Angstrom UV photon) when it falls into the bound ground state. For example, the electron and proton masses (times c2) are about 511 keV and 938 MeV respectively, but when the electron is bound to the proton in a hydrogen atom, the mass of the atom is about 13.6 eV lower than the sum of the electron and proton masses.

See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyman_series

Bob S
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top