Do electrons move closer to nucie?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bayan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
AI Thread Summary
Electrons move to higher energy levels by absorbing energy, which takes them further from the nucleus, while falling to lower levels releases energy in the form of photons. The potential energy of an electron is negative and becomes less negative as it moves away from the nucleus, indicating that it is bound within the atom. When an electron transitions between energy levels, the energy difference determines the frequency and wavelength of the emitted photon, with greater energy differences resulting in higher frequencies and shorter wavelengths. The discussion clarifies that lower energy levels are closer to the nucleus, while higher levels are further away. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping atomic behavior in physics.
bayan
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
i had a question about electrong moving to a higher level of energy.
When they do move to higher level energy do they get closer to nucie or do they move further from the nuclie (ie when forming a Photon.)

When sodium makes a yellow light would the wave length get smaller if an electron from a diffrent shell moves or does it get bigger?

i am doing year 11 physics and i asked this question to my teacher and he said that he wants me to find it out.
I know that he knew the answer but he wants me to find the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential energy in the field of a nucleus for an electron is negative. The closer an electron gets to the nucleus, the more negative its potential. This means that the electron is bound, that it can't leave the potential well without energy being applied to it (to raise it to at least 0).

So a higher shell has a less negative energy, which is why when an electron falls from a higher shell to a lower shell, the difference in potential energy is emitted in the form of a photon.

That being said, we can think about the wavelengths of photons that are emitted when electrons change energy level. The energy of a photon is related to its wavelength by the formula

E = h\nu

So the greater difference in energy between the two states between which the electron is transferring, the greater the frequency (\nu) and the less the wavelength (\lambda), because

\lambda = \frac{c}{\nu}

So you tell me, which will result in a photon with a higher frequency, an electron falling from the n=2 level to the n=1 level or an electron falling from the n=3 level to the n=1 level?

cookiemonster
 
Last edited:
would it be the electron from the 3rd shell transfering to 1st shell?

what i have understood from this is that doesn't matter if an electron moving from the 5th to 4th shell would have the same frequency and wavelength as an electron moving from 8th shell to 7th shell. Am i right or wrong.

i saw a picture of energy levels that referred if energy level is lower it is closer to nulie is that right or is it the higher the energy level the closer it gets?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Back
Top