Do employers care where you went to school?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kdinser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    School
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision of transferring to either a high-priced private university or a more affordable public university for completing a degree in electrical engineering. The private university has a better local reputation but comes with a significantly higher cost. The main concern raised is whether employers will prioritize the prestige of the private school over the public one after a few years of work experience. Opinions vary, with some arguing that the reputation of the school matters less in engineering fields, where skills and experience are more critical. Others emphasize that many respected public universities offer excellent programs and should not be dismissed based on generalizations about public education. The conversation also touches on the importance of campus environment and personal fit, suggesting that prospective students should visit campuses and engage with current students to gauge their experiences. Overall, the consensus leans towards the idea that while a prestigious name can help in securing interviews, practical skills and experience will ultimately determine job prospects in engineering.
kdinser
Messages
335
Reaction score
2
I'm really having a tough time deciding where to transfer to next fall to complete my degree in electrical engineering. My choices are, a high priced private university that has a very good local reputation. Or, a much cheaper, public university. From what I've been able to dig up through my research, the public university does have a good local rep, but the private school has a slightly better one. The private school would cost me about 30k as opposed to about 10k at the public school.

So, my question is this:
After I've been working for 2 to 3 years, is any employer going to care if I went to the private college as opposed to the public?

Money is almost meaningless to me. My biggest concern is finding a job I enjoy that will pay the bills. 40k to 60k a year is all I really need to be happy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if your staying local, might as well go to the private one. Public school kinda sucks because its government funded which kinda implies its own built-in stupidity and inefficiency. Ask people who go there about the environment and the profs and see whawt their opinions are. And if money is meaningless to you, why does it matter lol.
 
Pengwuino said:
Well if your staying local, might as well go to the private one. Public school kinda sucks because its government funded which kinda implies its own built-in stupidity and inefficiency. Ask people who go there about the environment and the profs and see whawt their opinions are. And if money is meaningless to you, why does it matter lol.

Take note that University of Illinois, UCLA, UC-Berkeley, U. of Wisconsin, U. of Michigan, SUNY Stony Brook, U. of North Carolina, Florida State University, U. of Washington, etc.. etc.. are ALL public schools. I'll be damned if these public school "sucks". These schools are as good as any of the Ivy League schools that so many people have over-glorified. Illinois, for example, has consistently been ranked #1 in the country in condensed matter. UCLA and Maryland have accelerator physics program that everyone envies.

Do NOT have blinders on with respect to public and private education. Such shortsightedness should not happen at this stage.

Zz.
 
Does it matter? It depends entirely on the employer. Certainly, it matters much more for academia than for virtually any commercial employer. For engineering, it doesn't matter much at all -- if you have the skills, you will get a job. You might have a higher chance to get an interview with a big-name school on your resume, but your experience will be the dominant factor in that. The vast majority of engineers are educated at state schools, so you'll be in good company.

For the record, I have the feeling that Pengwuino is a young kid, not yet college-age, who doesn't really have any idea of what he's talking about. State schools are stupid and inefficient? :smile:

- Warren
 
Well i live in California.. as do you so you should know what I am talking about! I mean come on, UC Merced? pffff and the CSU system has been getting budget cuts left and right and in some cases having 10x hte applicants as spots to fill yet still finding reasons to cut enrollment levels. Plus the always looming tuition increases... go team democrat run state! But in retrospect, these are all rather administrative and system-wide problems in California alone... and we're California so we're rather unique.
 
Yes... And UC Berkeley is quite a hell-hole, eh?

- Warren
 
Berkeley gets a crap load of external funding. The other universities (CSU system for example) don't have that luxury :)
 
Pengwuino said:
Well i live in California.. as do you so you should know what I am talking about! I mean come on, UC Merced? pffff and the CSU system has been getting budget cuts left and right and in some cases having 10x hte applicants as spots to fill yet still finding reasons to cut enrollment levels. Plus the always looming tuition increases... go team democrat run state! But in retrospect, these are all rather administrative and system-wide problems in California alone... and we're California so we're rather unique.

You seem to be missing the point, and appear to be cultivating a rather bad habit of making across-the-board judgement based on your incomplete observation. You said, without hesitation, that all public schools "suck". If you go back to what I said, I stressed that all public schools do NOT suck. And I gave you SPECIFIC examples of public schools where people will cut off their right hand to get into (check how many graduate applicants UIUC gets each year to get into condensed matter, or undergraduate EE).

Eliminating a school SIMPLY based on the fact that it is a public school is highly shortsighted. You will miss out on some terrific education (at a bargain, no less). However, I am more worried that you have no qualm in forming an overall judgement based on the flimsiest of evidence. A lot of our social problems and prejudices can be traced to such practices.

Zz.
 
I'm just wondering, is there co-op in the states for an engineering degree student? I live in Canada and I am currently enrolled in University of Waterloo for Mechanical Engineering. Every single Engineering program at Waterloo is co-op, same with Accounting, and some Mathematics and Architecture (this is what makes it ranked #1 in Canada overall). The co-op begins in first year, right after first term is over. This is what separates good schools from bad ones (in my oppinion). I am just wondering if there are schools in the US like this, or is it like conventional schooling.

Regards,

Nenad
 
  • #10
ZapperZ said:
Take note that University of Illinois, UCLA, UC-Berkeley, U. of Wisconsin, U. of Michigan, SUNY Stony Brook, U. of North Carolina, Florida State University, U. of Washington, etc.. etc.. are ALL public schools. I'll be damned if these public school "sucks". These schools are as good as any of the Ivy League schools that so many people have over-glorified. Illinois, for example, has consistently been ranked #1 in the country in condensed matter. UCLA and Maryland have accelerator physics program that everyone envies.
Zz.
I'll second that.

I periodically contact people at these institutions, and they certainly are as good as any so-called 'prestigious' (e.g. Ivy league) school, and in some cases better. When I look at a prospective employee, I am simply interested in what they know, what interests they have (i.e. compatible with the work we do), and their work habits. I prefer self-directed individuals to whom I simply assign a task, and it gets done correctly and efficiently. I don't want to micro-manage.
 
  • #11
Nenad -- Northeastern in Boston is a co-op school, for all students. And, it's a very good school indeed.

While all public colleges and universities are not excellent, not all private ones are excellent.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
  • #12
I go to a public school right now. You can probably tell by my user name. (and not in California.)

I had a choice between CU and Georgia Tech, I chose CU based partly on cost, location, and also my major (Aerospace) is damn good at CU, and much less money.

But employers really won't care where you went to school. They care about grades and experience.
 
  • #13
Grades, experience. Word from the wise, though: CHECK OUT THE CAMPUS BEFORE COMMITING. I went to the U of A solely because of money issues, and turned out hating the people there, but loving the campus. The only friends I made were a good 7 years older than me. So unless you want a lonely, miserable first few semesters, check out the campus and location and see if it 'clicks' with you.

Learn from our mistakes.
 
  • #14
Yes, campus visits are important.

Also talk to people on the phone about questions. One big reason I decided against University of Florida was that the students working the phones couldn't answer my questions or direct me to someone who could answer them.

It was pulling teeth getting anything from them.

The school I go to now was and is good about getting back to you.
 
  • #15
ZapperZ said:
You seem to be missing the point, and appear to be cultivating a rather bad habit of making across-the-board judgement based on your incomplete observation. You said, without hesitation, that all public schools "suck". If you go back to what I said, I stressed that all public schools do NOT suck. And I gave you SPECIFIC examples of public schools where people will cut off their right hand to get into (check how many graduate applicants UIUC gets each year to get into condensed matter, or undergraduate EE).

Yes, it was pretty much a passing 'throw in my ill-thought of 2 cents' moment. Need to stop doing that when I am around intelligent people (my 'home' forum is like a politic-filled warzone).
 
  • #16
Pengwuino said:
Well if your staying local, might as well go to the private one. Public school kinda sucks because its government funded which kinda implies its own built-in stupidity and inefficiency. Ask people who go there about the environment and the profs and see whawt their opinions are. And if money is meaningless to you, why does it matter lol.


Wow, you really don't know what you're talking about.

IN any other state you may be right, but not in california, where you live.

UCSB is a top 10 physics program, Cal Berkely and UCLA are creme of the crop in a number of fields.

UCLA runs Los Alamos, Berkely runs Lawrence Berkely let's not forget as well.
 
  • #17
franznietzsche said:
Wow, you really don't know what you're talking about.

IN any other state you may be right, but not in california, where you live.

UCSB is a top 10 physics program, Cal Berkely and UCLA are creme of the crop in a number of fields.

UCLA runs Los Alamos, Berkely runs Lawrence Berkely let's not forget as well.

Actually, University of California system administer Los Alamos, not UCLA.

Zz.
 
  • #18
ZapperZ said:
Actually, University of California system administer Los Alamos, not UCLA.

Zz.

Indeed, my mistake.
 
  • #19
geez guys.. why are we arguing? its just 100 grand for bs in physics
 
  • #20
franznietzsche said:
Wow, you really don't know what you're talking about.

IN any other state you may be right, but not in california, where you live.

UCSB is a top 10 physics program, Cal Berkely and UCLA are creme of the crop in a number of fields.

UCLA runs Los Alamos, Berkely runs Lawrence Berkely let's not forget as well.

Well there is only a handful of examples. No one here seems to bring up the CSU system or community colleges that don't have loads of money comen in for research and alumni and through sports :)
 
  • #21
Pengwuino said:
Well there is only a handful of examples. No one here seems to bring up the CSU system or community colleges that don't have loads of money comen in for research and alumni and through sports :)



Community colelges are not universities. That's comparing apples and oranges.

Calpoly SLO is more selective than most of the UC schools.
 
  • #22
shut up, its a school :P hehehe

And selectivity isn't exactly the most important thing about schools. I got accepted to CSU-cal poly along with a few other people (and the other people had... 1200's and 3.0 gpa's... my scorse and gpa were better but i didnt want to move away). And I've really been focusing on what its like to be at the schools compared to what the topic is though.
 
  • #23
Pengwuino said:
shut up, its a school :P hehehe

That was just stupid.

And selectivity isn't exactly the most important thing about schools. I got accepted to CSU-cal poly along with a few other people (and the other people had... 1200's and 3.0 gpa's...

Not at SLO, my cousin got rejected last year with 1300 something and more than a 3.0. SLO and Pomona are not the same, no matter what the people at Pomona want you to believe.

SLO is certainly close to the best undergrad engineering school in the state, arguably in the entire western US.

Do you know what second year aerospace engineering majors do here? They design planes from the ground up. Architecture majors typically complete a local project, actually having something they design constructed.

And of course, if PG&E ever takes its collective head out of its ass, we'll be the host to the Diablo Canyon Neutrino experiment.
 
  • #24
Pengwuino said:
Well there is only a handful of examples. No one here seems to bring up the CSU system or community colleges that don't have loads of money comen in for research and alumni and through sports :)

That's not relevant to the question. There are also private schools that are small and don't have that great of an education compared to some larger public schools. The questions was whether it mattered to attend a good public university vs a good private university, not a top tier school vs a lower tiered school.

The only time it will make a difference is if you run into the rare employer who thinks the name of the university is more important than the education you obtained while there. If you've got the money, you certainly can pay for a brand name education, but it doesn't guarantee it's going to be any higher quality than a state university education.
 
  • #25
Moonbear said:
The only time it will make a difference is if you run into the rare employer who thinks the name of the university is more important than the education you obtained while there.

Sadly enough, in the real world, these types of employers are not rare.
 
  • #26
but here in my country ,,it really depends on the university becoz some university students get directly campus placements while most of them have to struggle..
 
  • #27
man, it all comes down to weather you are a communist or a capitalist. Commies. like public schools while capitalist like private education. Thats my say. Its a preety stupid assumption, but I haven't seen too may rich kids hat want to go to a Private School.

Regards,

Nenad
 
  • #28
Nenad said:
man, it all comes down to weather you are a communist or a capitalist. Commies. like public schools while capitalist like private education. Thats my say. Its a preety stupid assumption, but I haven't seen too may rich kids hat want to go to a Private School.

Regards,

Nenad

Hey Pengwuino, you should rejoice. I no longer think that you made the silliest remarks on this thread. This one here beats yours by a mile.

Zz.
 
  • #29
ZapperZ said:
Hey Pengwuino, you should rejoice. I no longer think that you made the silliest remarks on this thread. This one here beats yours by a mile.

Zz.

It was a joke.
 
  • #30
Nenad said:
It was a joke.


Then your sense of humour reminds me of a girl who suggested 9/11 as a humorous topic for a skit.
 
  • #31
franznietzsche said:
Then your sense of humour reminds me of a girl who suggested 9/11 as a humorous topic for a skit.

Buddy, calm down, were not talking 9/11 here. Don't assume anything, if you do, you make an ass out of you and me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top