Do extracurricular activities matter for grad school in math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kbfrob
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Graduate schools for mathematics primarily focus on academic performance and research experience rather than extracurricular activities. A strong GPA is crucial, and involvement in research is highly valued, as it demonstrates readiness for advanced study and the ability to contribute to the field. Tutoring and teaching opportunities can also enhance an application, showcasing both mastery of the subject and communication skills. While extracurriculars may reflect multitasking abilities, they are generally less significant than academic achievements and research involvement. It's advisable to take challenging courses like abstract algebra, real analysis, and topology, and to seek research opportunities with faculty to strengthen applications for elite graduate programs.
kbfrob
I am currently a math undergrad with my sights set on an elite grad school for pure school.
My question to what degree to grad school consider your extraciricular activies, i.e. clubs, community service, honor societies.
I have an excellent gpa, but I'm worried that my lack of activities will hold me back. I'm not involved in any clubs. I'm a member of a couple honor societies, but not particularly active.
Should i make a more conscious effort to get involved and boost my resume?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What I think is more important is that you work on your spelling and general use of English. Grad schools care much less about extracurriculars than college admission offices, but they do care if you can express yourself clearly and in a way that will be a credit to the department.
 
Come on, Van, it (sans title) wasn't that bad :-p

kbfrob: You appear to have a keen academic focus. Does your university give opportunities for senior undergraduates to tutor earlier-year students? By "tutor" in this context I mean taking a class of students from a course and helping with set problems, etc. If so, that is something some graduate schools will look favourably towards, as often graduate school will involve you doing some teaching. Regardless, teaching at this stage is a great way to consolidate what you have already learned and gain some confidence speaking to an audience about mathematics.

Outside tutoring maths, your university may also have peer mentoring programs, where you could use your academic experience to help newcomers make decisions about which courses to take and so forth.
 
kbfrog: I could give you a list, and this list i heavily weighted towards a Phd-position.

1. Research while still in your Bsc or Msc. Very good.

2. Tutoring in the subject at hand.

3. Tutoring writing at your writing center.

4. Work experience as a boss.

5. Being a treasurer of some sort. Be it charity or corporate sector.

6. Experience with the applied world of the science you want to do a PhD in. (once again work experience).

7. being a very good athlete.
 
In my experience applying to grad school in physics, I've found that extracurriculars don't matter at all. The only application I filled out which even asked about extracurricular activities did so in the portion of the application that I turned into the graduate college (i.e. it wasn't the physics department's idea). I've also spoken to professors about this. The only thing they care about is that you demonstrate the mathematical ability to handle graduate level coursework in math, and that you portray yourself as someone who can excel at research.

Consider this: for the next five to seven years (hopefully closer to five), you'll be taking a couple years worth of courses, and then doing research. For the first two years they'll be paying you to teach, and for the last three to five they'll be paying you to do research. What matters to the department is that you justify the cost they are expending on you by successfully earning your PhD from their department. Extracurriculars might demonstrate your ability to multitask. But strong involvement in math research demonstrates that you are ready for graduate school. So it is in your best interest for your application to strongly convey that you are good at math and good at doing research.

You already have a good GPA, which is very beneficial to you. There are only two other things that I would recommend. First, take challenging courses. Specifically, take abstract algebra, real analysis, and topology, since these are the three important subjects in mathematics. Secondly, get involved in research with a professor. REUs are one good way to get into this. Another is simply to ask a professor if he's willing to pay you to work for him.

Anyway, I hope this helps!
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top