Do Forces, Impulse, and Momentum Change Equally in a Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattfelner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
In a collision between a bug and a car's windshield, the forces of impact on both are equal due to Newton's Third Law. The impulse experienced by both the bug and the car is also equal, as momentum is conserved in the system; any momentum lost by one is gained by the other. However, the change in speed is not the same due to the significant difference in mass, with the bug experiencing a greater change in speed. The changes in momentum for both the bug and the car are equal, as they must balance out to conserve momentum. Understanding these principles clarifies the dynamics of collisions involving objects of differing masses.
mattfelner
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit stumped on the following, as I'm not sure how to distinguish between the following. Thanks to all those who shed some light.

A bug and a windshield of a fast moving car collide. Indicate and explain whether each statement is true or false.

a. The forces of impact on the bug and the windshield are the same size.
True? I suppose because of Newton's third law the force would be indentical.

b. The impulse on the bug and the car are the same size.
I'm a bit confused. I know FxT=Impulse=Change In Momentum. I would suppose that the big's momentum loss would be greater, but I'm only speaking from a practical/obvious POV.

c. The change in speed of the bug and the car is the same
Falso. Perhaps their related somehow, but I know that's false.

d. The changes in momentum of the bug and the car are the same size?
I would say true, because wouldn't the system after the collision have to somehow equal the momentum of the two separate systems before it? I assume this could only be achieved if the momentum's were related.

Thank you to all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) I think Newton's Third Law is a good way to argue that. The force of the bug on the windshield must be the same magnitude as the force of the windshield on the bug.

b) Impulse is change in momentum. Since linear momentum is absolutely conserved, and since we are considering only the bug and the car, whatever momentum one of them loses must be gained by the other one - otherwise, there'd be a net gain or loss.

c) We know the change in momentum is the same for the two, so the change in the product of the mass times the velocity must be the same for the two. Since the mass of the windshield and the bug are both constant (a good assumption for the windshield, probably not for the bug, but let's not get disgusting here...), the difference must come in the change in velocity. Since the mass of the bug is (presumably, unless you live in Florida) much less than the mass of the windshield, the change in velocity of the bug must be correspondingly greater.

The question, however, doesn't ask about velocity but speed, and this could make a difference - I'll leave you to puzzle out why it doesn't.

d) Already answered in part b.
 
thanks so much
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top