Do I go Physics, Chemistry, or Engineering?

AI Thread Summary
Considering a career change, a 34-year-old nurse is exploring options in Physics, Chemistry, or Engineering to contribute to environmental solutions. The discussion highlights a passion for renewable energy sources like solar, wind, hydropower, and geothermal energy, but also acknowledges a lack of hands-on skills in tinkering and building. Physics is recommended for its foundational understanding of energy and motion, while Chemistry offers insights into matter and reactions, including pollution and combustion processes. Engineering is suggested as the most applicable field, as it combines theoretical knowledge with practical applications in energy systems, although it may require proficiency in math. The conversation also introduces Materials Science as a potential area of interest, linking it to environmental concerns. Overall, pursuing a degree in engineering is viewed as a strong path forward for someone eager to understand and impact environmental technologies.
danielandpenn
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Do I go Physics, Chemistry, or Engineering?

Boy, do I need some insight if any are willing and serious. I'm a 34 y.o. married nurse(assoc degree), wife, and mom who has been seriously considering a career change for the past year. I want to figure out how things work to help our environment. I love learning about solar, wind, hydropower energy, geothermal energy. I'm not, however, good at tinkering and building things. I live near the steel mills where a lot of coal-burning takes place. Where do I start? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can get a 4-year degree in engineering or science or try a technical school where you can train to be a technician.

Not good at tinkering? If you can imagine it you can do it.
 


danielandpenn said:
Boy, do I need some insight if any are willing and serious. I'm a 34 y.o. married nurse(assoc degree), wife, and mom who has been seriously considering a career change for the past year. I want to figure out how things work to help our environment. I love learning about solar, wind, hydropower energy, geothermal energy. I'm not, however, good at tinkering and building things. I live near the steel mills where a lot of coal-burning takes place. Where do I start? Thanks!

That right there says I love engineering but I might not be good at it.

Physics will teach you the fundamentals of nature. That is, you will really understand that energy is merely a mathematical concept we devised to understand motion. This, and other fundamental facts, will be derived and discussed.

The other two are more "applied sciences". That is, they apply physical laws to understand different things. Chemistry is the study of matter and how it reacts. It is a very broad science that deals with things like plastics, materials, and medicine. Chemistry won't deal with different kinds of energy used in power plants per se, but you will get a detailed treatment of coal-burning (and other combustion reactions) as well as pollution.

Engineering will probably discuss these things in depth, as they are the ones building our plants. They will only gloss over the theory, but you will have enough knowledge to understand how these plants function.
 


danielandpenn said:
Boy, do I need some insight if any are willing and serious. I'm a 34 y.o. married nurse(assoc degree), wife, and mom who has been seriously considering a career change for the past year. I want to figure out how things work to help our environment. I love learning about solar, wind, hydropower energy, geothermal energy. I'm not, however, good at tinkering and building things. I live near the steel mills where a lot of coal-burning takes place. Where do I start? Thanks!


Yes, I would definitely go with engineering. These 3 subjects, of course, are all related. But if you go the engineering route, you will definitely encounter general physics and general chemistry.


You might consider also: MATERIALS SCIENCE. This is yet another branch of the science tree; and I think a very cool subject.
 


danielandpenn said:
Boy, do I need some insight if any are willing and serious. I'm a 34 y.o. married nurse(assoc degree), wife, and mom who has been seriously considering a career change for the past year. I want to figure out how things work to help our environment. I love learning about solar, wind, hydropower energy, geothermal energy. I'm not, however, good at tinkering and building things. I live near the steel mills where a lot of coal-burning takes place. Where do I start? Thanks!

Are you math proficient?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top