Is Understanding Green's Functions Essential When Using the Laplace Transform?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WiFO215
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AI Thread Summary
Green's functions are essential tools in solving differential equations, particularly in systems responding to impulse inputs. While the Laplace Transform is effective for problems like Simple Harmonic Oscillators, Green's functions offer advantages in various applications, including electromagnetic scattering. They provide automatic transfer functions and can be more versatile than the Laplace Transform in certain contexts. Understanding Green's functions is not overly complex, and integrating them into problem-solving early on is advisable, as they can enhance analytical capabilities and broaden the range of solvable problems.
WiFO215
Messages
416
Reaction score
1
This is the first time I've ever needed to use Green's functions while solving problems, although I've used the delta input in differential equations before to solve for systems with an 'impulse'. I am still trying to work my way around them and wanted to know how important they were.

I've used the Laplace Transform plenty of times before and am comfortable with it. I can solve the problems that I am presented with (Simple Harmonic Oscillators; Damped, undamped etc) far quicker using the method of the Laplace transform.

Would you guys recommend putting Green's functions away for later, or should I begin acquainting myself with these functions right from the start? Are they all that important? Why couldn't I just stick with the LT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They can become very useful in that you automatically have the transfer function. In addition, they are useful for a variety of applications. I use Green's functions for electromagnetic scattering problems. Their potential usage goes beyond applications where you can use the Laplace transform.
 
Understanding how to use them is not all that difficult, so i see no reason to put them away for later.
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Back
Top