MHB Do Intervals [0, 2) and [5, 6) U [7, 8) Have the Same Cardinality?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the intervals A = [0, 2) and B = [5, 6) U [7, 8) have the same cardinality by constructing a bijection. A proposed function f maps elements from A to B, defined as f(x) = x + 5 for x in [0, 1) and f(x) = x + 6 for x in [1, 2). Participants emphasize the need to demonstrate that this function is both injective and surjective. There are minor corrections regarding notation, clarifying that the intervals should be [5, 6) and [1, 2). The conversation highlights the importance of precise mathematical definitions in proving cardinality.
KOO
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Prove that the interval A = [0 , 2) has the same cardinality as the set B = [5 , 6) U [7 , 8) by constructing a bijection between the two sets

Attempt:

x ↦ x + 5 for x ∈ [0 ; 1)
x ↦ x + 6 for x ∈ [1 ; 2)

What to do next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KOO said:
What to do next?

Prove that $f:[0,2)\to [5\color{red},\color{\black}6)\cup [7,8)$
$$f(x)=\left \{ \begin{matrix} x+5& \mbox{ if }& x\in [0,1)\\x+6 & \mbox{ if }&x\in [1\color{red},\color{\black}2)\end{matrix}\right.$$
is injective and surjective.
 
Last edited:
Fernando Revilla said:
Prove that $f:[0,2)\to [5.6)\cup [7,8)$
$$f(x)=\left \{ \begin{matrix} x+5& \mbox{ if }& x\in [0,1)\\x+6 & \mbox{ if }&x\in [1.2)\end{matrix}\right.$$
is injective and surjective.
Did you mean [5,6) and not [5.6)?

Also, [1,2) and not [1.2)?

Thanks!
 
KOO said:
Did you mean [5,6) and not [5.6)?
Also, [1,2) and not [1.2)?

Of course, my fingers were clumsy. :)
 
Greetings, I am studying probability theory [non-measure theory] from a textbook. I stumbled to the topic stating that Cauchy Distribution has no moments. It was not proved, and I tried working it via direct calculation of the improper integral of E[X^n] for the case n=1. Anyhow, I wanted to generalize this without success. I stumbled upon this thread here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-prove-the-cauchy-distribution-has-no-moments.992416/ I really enjoyed the proof...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K