Do Lifting Magnets Waste Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abbas13677
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lifting Magnet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether lifting magnets, particularly electromagnets and superconducting magnets, waste energy when used to lift heavy objects like cars. Participants explore the mechanics of how these magnets operate and the energy implications involved in their use.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if lifting magnets use energy, particularly focusing on superconductors and their ability to generate static force without energy consumption.
  • Another participant clarifies that electromagnets require energy to create a magnetic field, which can vary based on several factors.
  • Work is defined in terms of energy, with a participant emphasizing that lifting a car involves work done against gravity.
  • A participant seeks clarification on whether large superconductors used for lifting heavy objects consume energy, noting their low resistance.
  • There is a distinction made between electromagnets and ordinary magnets, with the former requiring energy to function, even if superconductors are involved.
  • One participant points out that energy is wasted as heat due to resistance in the wire coils of electromagnets, while superconductors waste less energy due to their lack of resistance.
  • Another participant discusses energy loss in the metal body of the car when a magnetic field induces current, leading to additional energy waste.
  • A later reply suggests that if both the lifting magnet and the car are made of superconducting materials, energy waste due to resistance could be minimized.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the energy consumption of lifting magnets, particularly regarding the role of superconductors. There is no consensus on whether superconducting magnets completely eliminate energy waste when lifting objects.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors affecting energy use, such as resistance in materials and the mechanics of lifting, but do not resolve the implications of these factors on overall energy consumption.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying electromagnetism, superconductivity, or engineering applications involving lifting mechanisms.

abbas13677
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I want know that lifting magnets for lifting a lots of cars ; so it use energy or not?

Why a lifting magnet use energy?

It can only have a static force with his superconductor !
Why that superconductor use energy(electricity) for his static force?


virtualempire.com/banners/vebtn3.gif
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Those are electromagnets.. they temporarily behave as magnets while current is passing through them and their magnetic filed intensity can be changed depending on a number of factors.
 
Don't forget that work must be done to pull the car off the ground.

Work = Force * Distance

Work is a synonym for energy as far as I know.
 
OK i know that force is not Work !


i only want know that big supercodactors for lifting big irons use energy or now?

if they use so please explain that why they use energy for lifting ...
(i know that supercondactors have not resistance or have very thin resistance !)
 
>>>>attention that i want only electromagnet be a magnet and lift the car or drop down it ...
 
Separate the two types of magnets. An electromagnet is convenient but uses energy to produce the magnetic field (even if it's a superconductor, it uses energy - just in a less straightforward manner). So, if you use an ordinary magnet (albeit a very large one) to lift a car, it is easier to think about and you can see there are two points at which work is done. When the magnet nears the car and attracts the car, work is done in the metal of the car. When the crane lifts the magnet attached to the car, the crane does work.

The thing you probably want to focus on is the changing magnetic field in the body of the car. That will always be an energy drain. You can somewhat disguise this work by making it subtle, but you will always have both a hysteresis loop and a Fd term at the minimum.
 
tanx
so electro magnets use energy when the ELECTRIC is swing around the electromagnet by resistance
 
abbas13677 said:
tanx
so electro magnets use energy when the ELECTRIC is swing around the electromagnet by resistance

I don't understand your statement, so can't answer it. Can you please restate it in another way.
 
abbas13677 said:
tanx
so electro magnets use energy when the ELECTRIC is swing around the electromagnet by resistance

Yes energy is wasted by the heat generated when current flows through the resistance of the wire coils in the magnet. Superconducting magnets don't have resistance and so don't waste as much energy.
There is also energy wasted in the metal body of the car, the magnetic field causes current to flow in the metal of the car which has resitance and so wastes energy as heat.

There is also work done by the crane which then ifts the car - but this is the same if a magnet or a hook is used.
 
  • #10
SO if the lifter builded by superconductor it don't use energy !
OK i understand that



-----------------------
So the energy of lifter spended on the Car !?
>
So if we build a car with superconductor ; So the energy of lifter don't waste with car resistance ? (because our car that lifted by superconductor lifter ; builded by superconductor and so it have not resistance and it don't waste energy)


i'm true?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K