I Do Massive Objects Like the Sun Deflect Neutrinos?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter HeavyWater
  • Start date Start date
HeavyWater
Messages
55
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
Do massive objects deflect the trajectories of neutrinos?
We know the results of Einstein's experiment in 1919. Simply stated, the sun deflected the paths of photons. The results were exciting for many reasons--one of which was that photons have no mass. Neutrinos do have mass. Do other massive objects, such as the sun, deflect the paths of neutrinos?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Why would neutrinos be any different from any other massive particle in this regard?
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
Thank you for the rapid response Orodruin.
 
Orodruin said:
Yes. Why would neutrinos be any different from any other massive particle in this regard?
Don't Neutrinos have nonzero rest mass and still travel at lightspeed? Could this possibly give them the inertia needed to continue in a straight line, piercing stars and galaxies unbent as well as unslowed?
Doubtful, but do we know?
 
They typically travel at a speed very close to but below the speed of light. The difference is too small to measure it but it is there.
Everything is deflected by gravity. This is a property of spacetime, it doesn't depend on the particle type.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
HeavyWater said:
Summary: Do massive objects deflect the trajectories of neutrinos?
To your question, general relativity tells us that mass bends space-time. So light and neutrinos are deflected by massive objects.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top