Do Matter Waves Travel Faster Than Light?

shaan_aragorn
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Why do matter waves (as in wave-particle duality) travel faster than light? How is it possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shaan_aragorn said:
Why do matter waves (as in wave-particle duality) travel faster than light? How is it possible?

Welcome to PhysicsForums!

"Matter waves" (such as electrons, which have a relativistic mass) do not travel faster than c (the speed of light in a vacuum). In fact they can never equal c either.

There are rare/special occasions (Cherenkov radiation) in which such a particle can exceed the speed of light in a particular medium, but it is still less than c. In particle accelerators, electrons are regularly accelerated to over 99% of c, but never all the way up to c.
 
Another interesting thing to understand that even in such circumstances special theory is not violated since they cannot carry any information
 
shaan_aragorn said:
Why do matter waves (as in wave-particle duality) travel faster than light? How is it possible?

It is only the phase speed which appears to move faster than c. This apparent
speed depends on the actual material speed v like, phase speed = c2/v.

This means for instance that the phase speed becomes infinite as the
material speed becomes zero! This may sound all weird but the explanation
is actually simple and beautiful. It's the theory of Special Relativity at work.

I wrote an illustrated explanation which you can read here:

http://www.chip-architect.com/physics/deBroglie.pdf

You'll find it as well as you google for: relativistic de broglie wave packet



Regards, Hans
 
Last edited:
Nice paper!

That's a very interesting and informative paper - thanks!
Ed
 
In QFT, there is a nonzero probability for a particle to propagate faster than light (or, as they say, "outside the light cone"). Read the causality section 2.4 in Peskin and Schroeder for how this is nevertheless compatible with relativity.

Carl
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top