Medical Do Men Really Experience Vengeance Differently Than Women?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CosminaPrisma
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a Nature article exploring how empathic neural responses are influenced by perceived fairness, particularly highlighting differences between male and female participants. Key points include the need for more comprehensive data on how empathy varies based on the gender of both players and observers, as well as how the context of a lab experiment might affect participants' perceptions of fairness. There is speculation that women may recognize the role-playing nature of the game more readily than men, potentially leading to differing responses in empathy and desire for revenge. The conversation also touches on competition as a significant factor in male behavior, suggesting that men may take competitive scenarios more seriously, which could influence their responses to perceived unfairness. The idea of socialization in relation to revenge and the potential for different reactions in non-competitive contexts is also proposed, indicating a need for further research to explore these dynamics.
Biology news on Phys.org
It's more productive here to provide the reference to the original Nature article rather than just some news magazine's interpretation of it, especially since the magazine article makes it very difficult to locate it just by following their link.

Nature 439, 466-469 (26 January 2006) | doi:10.1038/nature04271

Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others

Tania Singer1,2, Ben Seymour1, John P. O'Doherty3, Klaas E. Stephan1, Raymond J. Dolan1 and Chris D. Frith1

It's all interesting enough, and the areas of brain activation correlate well to the volunteer's responses on questionnaire's, indicating the regions being measured are likely to be relevant to the responses. Of course, these types of studies are somewhat unsatisfying in that they don't tell us anything about why the men and women differ in their responses.

One thing I wish had been included in the supplemental figures in the Nature article that wasn't was a comparison of how the male and female volunteers responded to male vs female players. They should have this data because they counterbalanced the study appropriately to control for gender differences in subjects and confederates, and I'd be really curious to know if there are any differences in empathy shown FOR women vs men, as opposed to BY women vs men.

Another thing that would be useful to know, but was not determined, is whether there were any differences between the sexes of subjects in how they perceived the game. What I mean is, is it possible that because this is all done in a lab where everyone knows they are part of an experiment, do the women more readily realize it was just a game, and the "unfair" player was just playing a role and isn't necessarily an unfair person than the men do? In the supplemental results provided, there was a pretty clear difference between men and women in the category of "deserved pain" when rating the "unfair" players, which is being interpreted as part of a desire for revenge, but what if women would equally desire revenge if this were a real-life situation, but in a lab setting, are able to recognize that this person is really just role-playing and thus remain empathetic, while the men are more prone to not distinguishing role-playing from reality? (Think about gender differences in people who play role-playing games; what if this is getting more at the reason why such games are more stimulating to more men than to as many women?) But, that STILL leaves wide open the question of WHY.
 
Moonbear said:
But, that STILL leaves wide open the question of WHY.
The first thing that comes to mind for me is competition. Men tend to take competition far more seriously then women. The desire for revenge here comes from playing a game. Every other object of revenge referenced in the article seems to involve competition in one for or another. War for most men is just another form of competition. In fact most games (board games and video games) that men play are based on war and battle. Even role playing games tend to be based more on these sorts of thing. As for your curiosity regarding taking role playing for reality and popularity of RPGs with males you may be interested to know that those RPGs that are based more on elements of politics, intregue, acting and over all just getting into characters' heads attract FAR more women than D&D and the like. Torture... men would tend more than likely to take this as doing what needs to be done to "win". In regards to criminals and the death penalty this could easily tie in with a view of "the game" of life. Those who break the rules of "the game" ought to be punished. Someone being punished for breaking the rules is likely seen as a small victory. Even though the man who sees it as such may himself be someone who "cheats" at "the game" it still means a draw back for "the competition". "He was caught and I wasn't so I must be playing the game better."

It would be interesting to see results for a similar experiment which does not involve any sort of competition.
 
IMO, people are socialized to learn the acceptability of vengeance or revenge, which are only acceptable to an undeveloped mind.
 
I don't believe women are less vengefull at all. Direct physical violence just isn't their preferred method. A follow up study could be done. If instead of physical pain the "unfair" players are seen to have to endure some frustration or emotional displeasure, I think you might find more of the women's "rewards" centers lighting up.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top