Do Neutrinos Leave Tracks in Cloud Chambers?

AI Thread Summary
Neutrinos do not leave tracks in cloud chambers, which complicates visualizing their interactions. The discussion highlights the use of vector addition to understand particle momentum, suggesting that three vectors forming a closed triangle can represent the scenario. A graphical representation could involve drawing a triangle with the vectors arranged tip-to-tail, indicating the direction and magnitude of the particles involved. Additionally, a diagram resembling cloud chamber tracks could illustrate the decay event, with tracks representing daughter particles while acknowledging that neutrinos themselves do not create visible paths. Overall, the challenge lies in accurately depicting the behavior of neutrinos in relation to observable particles.
colemc20
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A radioactive nucleus at rest decays into a second nucleus, an electron, and a neutrino. The electron and neutrino are emitted at right angles and have momenta of 9.40 ✕ 10-23 kg·m/s, and 5.10 ✕ 10-23 kg·m/s, respectively. What is the magnitude and direction of the momentum of the second (recoiling) nucleus?
Magnitude ___ kg·m/s
Direction ___ ° (measured from the direction opposite to the electron's momentum)
Relevant Equations
Conservation of Momentum
My only issue is what this would look like. I can't draw a respective picture.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is a vector. Suppose the electron is moving East and the neutrino is moving North. What is opposite of East? Find the angle relative to that.
 
colemc20 said:
My only issue is what this would look like. I can't draw a respective picture.
Three vectors that add to zero form a closed triangle when you add them using the tip-to-tail graphical method of vector addition. Furthermore, this is a right triangle with the unknown vector as the hypotenuse. So draw a right triangle with right sides 9.4 and 5.1 and the needed hypotenuse, put arrowheads tip to tail at the vertices and then move the vectors parallel to themselves so that their tails are all at the same point. Voila, you have your picture. N.B. the original position of the parent radioactive nucleus is where the tails meet.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
kuruman said:
Three vectors that add to zero form a closed triangle when you add them using the tip-to-tail graphical method of vector addition.
I agree that a picture as a triangle denoting tip-to-tail addition of three vectors is a good way to graphically calculate the unknown third vector.

However, for a "what would this look like" diagram, I would be more inclined to draw something akin to a set of cloud chamber tracks -- a mark in the center where the decay took place and three tracks extending outward corresponding to the three daughter particles. To tie it back to a momentum calculation, one would still want to set the length and direction of each track based on the momentum of the corresponding daughter particle.
 
Do neutrinos leave tracks in cloud chambers?
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
kuruman said:
Do neutrinos leave tracks in cloud chambers?
Nope. Hence the "something akin to".
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top