Do Particle Accelerators Experience Torque?

AI Thread Summary
Particle accelerators, particularly non-linear ones, do experience forces from the particle streams and magnetic fields, but these forces do not impart torque. In the LHC, acceleration is primarily achieved through electric fields rather than magnets, with significant energy stored in the magnets. The forces acting on the magnets come from countercirculating beams and internal stresses due to high magnetic fields. Newton's 3rd law applies, indicating that any acceleration of mass by a field results in equal and opposing effects on the apparatus. Overall, while forces exist, they do not create torque in the system.
bacon555
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In particular, ones that aren't linear, of course.

Does the particle stream or individual particle, whatever they're firing, impart some sort of vector force on the structure of the accelerator itself via the magnetic field, and into the magnets?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It must. I don't think the force would apply a torque though.
 
In the LHC the acceleration is accomplished not by magnets but by electric fields, namely eight superconducting RF cavities with a field gradient of 5 MV/m.

Forces on the magnets arise from the two countercirculating beams but also from internal stresses due to the maximum magnetic field of 8 Tesla. The beam energy is 350 MJ, but the energy stored in the magnets is much greater, 11 GJ.
 
So basically, no, because the field strength is higher than the angular momentum of the particle stream?
 
I'm going to assume you're wondering if Newton's 3rd law applies (in this case torques only exist in equal and opposing pairs), and it does. Any acceleration of mass by a field will ultimately have an equal and opposing effect on the apparatus (and whatever the apparatus is attached to, such as the earth) that generated the field.
 
That's exactly what I was wondering, thank you.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top