Admissions Do PHD admissions (specifically EE) prefer BS candidates over MS ones?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the perception and implications of pursuing a Master's degree (MS) versus directly applying for a PhD program, particularly in the context of American universities. There is a prevailing belief that obtaining a terminal MS degree may suggest a lack of acceptance into PhD programs, especially in physics, where students typically either seek employment after their undergraduate studies or pursue a PhD. This stigma does not seem to apply as strongly in engineering, where many students pursue an MS to enhance their professional skills without the intention of continuing to a PhD. Some engineering students do transition from a master's to a PhD, often with funding opportunities available. Overall, the decision to pursue an MS or PhD varies by discipline and individual circumstances, with financial considerations and career goals playing significant roles in these academic paths.
1230wc
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I've heard some schools do this. True in general?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1230wc said:
I've heard some schools do this. True in general?

Where are you from?

I've never heard of anything like this happening in the UK anyway, but (assuming you're American) our system is slightly different. Still, I can't see why this would ever be a general rule.
 
I'm american...
 
Hopefully someone will come along with a better answer, but it seems that (in America) applying to a PhD program with a BS is better than doing your MS first and then applying.
I'm sure there are many reasons, not the least of which is financial reasons (how long they have you as cheap labor).

I'm not saying this is fair, but where I'm at, doing a terminal MS degree implies that you were rejected from every single PhD program you applied to.
It seems that most people in Physics either search for employment after undergrad, or they go all the way to PhD. No one does the MS unless they "have to."

Again, I'm not saying that's fair...and I may be wrong about how grad programs view it, but that's how people seem to stigmatize the MS students at my University.*I'm not saying I agree with the idea that an MS means "couldn't get into a PhD program." I'm a physics major but really enjoy math. I would love the opportunity to spend a few years getting my MS in pure math before moving on to a Physics PhD program. (I realize I'll have the chance to take extra math courses in grad school, but I'd like to do more than that)
 
Troponin said:
I'm not saying this is fair, but where I'm at, doing a terminal MS degree implies that you were rejected from every single PhD program you applied to.
It seems that most people in Physics either search for employment after undergrad, or they go all the way to PhD. No one does the MS unless they "have to."

This is probably much less true in engineering. There is a much higher proportion of engineers who are not at all interested in academia but go to grad school to enhance their professional skills. For this group, the PhD doesn't usually make sense vs just getting the MS and working.

Then again, I don't know how many of these types of students end up applying to PhD programs. Those interested in PhDs usually still just apply straight to the PhD program. People change their minds of course, and that's certainly something that can be explained in the app.
 
kote said:
Then again, I don't know how many of these types of students end up applying to PhD programs.

It depends on the school. At mine, a good chunk of the engineering/comp sci phds got masters degrees and then realized that they wanted to go into phd programs. A friend of mine applied specifically for a masters program and was told she could probably get funded for a phd if she continued on. Basically, from what I've seen of engineers (US, public university), getting a masters doesn't kill their chances of getting into a phd program.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
92
Views
7K
Back
Top