B Do photons have mass and how does it affect their existence?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter superkraken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Photons
superkraken
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
this is the first time I am learning about photons and i have asmall doubt.
if photons are massless then how come light dosent escape from black holes.
or if they do have mass the by the eqn m=m0/(1-V2/c2)then theyll have infinite mass and turning on a torch may be like getting hit by a bullet train.so how do photons actually exist.with mass or without it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
superkraken said:
if photons are massless then how come light dosent escape from black holes.

Because they still exist in spacetime and thus have to follow the appropriate paths through spacetime. A black hole bends spacetime in such a way that ALL paths through spacetime lead further into the black hole.

That's a bare minimum explanation, and if you want to know more I encourage you to look into relativity.

superkraken said:
so how do photons actually exist.with mass or without it?

They have no mass, but they still have energy and momentum. Einstein's full equation is: e2 = m2c4 + p2c2

The term which includes mass is zero for photons, but the second is not, and reduces to: e=pc
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
superkraken said:
this is the first time I am learning about photons and i have asmall doubt.
if photons are massless then how come light dosent escape from black holes.
or if they do have mass the by the eqn m=m0/(1-V2/c2)then theyll have infinite mass and turning on a torch may be like getting hit by a bullet train.so how do photons actually exist.with mass or without it?

Photons are quantum objects, elementary lumps of energy of the electromagnetic field. As of such, they have a hard time sharing classical particle properties (like position). If one still adopts a quantum particle interpretation of the uni-photon states, then these objects are massless, i.e. zero invariant mass.
When one forcibly puts photons in black holes, they do escape, as far as I know.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
47
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top