Do photons have to accelerate to the speed of light

AI Thread Summary
Photons do not accelerate to the speed of light; they are created at that speed due to their zero rest mass. When a light bulb is turned on, photons are produced instantaneously and travel at the speed of light from the moment of their creation. The discussion highlights that, according to special relativity, photons always move at light speed, eliminating the concept of acceleration for them. The analogy of sound waves is used to illustrate that, like sound, photons propagate at a constant speed without needing to accelerate. Ultimately, photons exist only at the speed of light, and there is no initial speed to consider.
indigojoker
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
i have just a question that came to my mind. do photons have to accelerate to the speed of light every time a light bulb is turned on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
good question! :approve:

indigojoker said:
i have just a question that came to my mind. do photons have to accelerate to the speed of light every time a light bulb is turned on?


well.. answer these, and i hope your doubt will be cleared.
1. when you say, "do photons have to accelerate to the speed of light", what are you assuming the initial speed of the photon?
2. do u know that rest mass of a photon is zero?
3. try to calculate, if you know relevant formula, mass of a photon at any speed other than the speed of light.. and you will surely get the answer.
 
1. i don't know the initial speed of the photon, that is part of my question
2. yes
3. photons always has to travel a the speed of light due to special reletivity

basically, how do photons accelerate instantaneously to the speed of light? as in, you are in a dark room... thus no photos (in the visible spectrum). Then you turn on the light... electricity excites the filaments in a bulb and photons are produces, are you saying they are produced at the speed of light?
 
well... i am a student only, and i haven't done a full-fledged course on relativity and/or quantum physics. i think, if u want to discuss it thoroughly, u shud check in higher levels.. this introductory physics won't help u.
still.. what i think is.. consider here the wave nature of the photon.. it will move with the same speed as soon as it is created! (like sound waves emanating from any source: they move with a constant wave speed, they do not accelerate to that speed.)
and, look at the third part of ur answer.. photons always have to travel at the speed of light! so where comes the question of, "accelerating".
 
well, how did they originally get to the speed of light if they did not accelerate to it? or maybe it's instantaneous acceleration... maybe i shouldn't post this in the HW section since this was just a thought...
 
think: what was being accelerated? (if u even think that there was an instantaneous acceleration!)
There can be no photon below the speed of light! It's created with the speed of light only.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top