Do Rotational Bands in Nuclei Indicate Changes in Deformation or Nucleon Levels?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eXorikos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    excitations Model
eXorikos
Messages
281
Reaction score
5
A nucleus has several rotational bands built on different Nilsson Model levels. Do these bandheads occur for different deformation of the nucleus or does an individual nucleon change level?

My educated guess is that it's the deformation that changes, but I need to be sure. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I read in a paper that these rotational bands in the nucleus I'm studying are based on quasiproton excitations. So this means it's a collective excitation that behaves like a single proton.

However when I look into a different paper, I read this.
For a system with an odd number of nucleons the lowest non-collective excitations are single-quasiparticle states.

Now I'm confused.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top