B Do Satellites and the ISS Use Power to Maintain Attitude Control?

AI Thread Summary
Satellites and the ISS require power for attitude control, primarily using control moment gyroscopes (CMGs) and thrusters. The ISS does not utilize tidal locking and relies on CMGs for subtle orientation adjustments, while thrusters assist during larger torque events. During routine operations, the ISS maintains a torque equilibrium attitude (TEA) to minimize thruster use, but critical operations necessitate more intensive attitude holds, which can complicate maneuvering. The attitude control system is highly sensitive, allowing for precise adjustments based on crew movements and operational needs. Overall, maintaining orientation in space involves a combination of advanced technology and careful planning to ensure stability and safety.
berkeman
Admin
Messages
69,099
Reaction score
23,983
I tried a Google search on this question, and got mixed results. I was curious if satellites (and the ISS) have to burn power to stay pointed at Earth, or if any were able to use passive tidal locking instead. I did find that satellites in geosychronous orbit are less likely to use tidal locking since they are so far away from the Earth, but beyond that the links that I found were ambiguous.

So is a fair portion of the solar panel power in satellites going into keeping the attitude gyro spinning and turning it to maintain the attitude of the satellite? And I did find that the ISS does not use tidal locking; does it have some giant gyro stabilizer somewhere, or does it take continuous replacement of fuel to be able to use its reaction jets to maintain its orientation as it orbits?

Thanks. :smile:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Tidal locking tends to orient the long axis of a satellite toward Earth so pretty sure the ISS has to have some attitude adjustment to keep it oriented "horizontally". I don't know if other satellites need to maintain such a horizontal configuration.

I always assumed ISS used attitude jets.
 
Found this:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/...station-keep-its-orientation/?sh=50ad57e03a18

Also here:
https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-ISS-keep-its-orientation
(Robert Frost is Flight Engineer at NASA, so he's probably gleaned a few things in the cafeteria.)

"Nominally, attitude control is provided by four control moment gyroscopes (CMGs). Each CMG contains a wheel that is 220 lbs (100 kg). That wheel spins at 6600 rpm, resulting in an angular momentum of 3500 ft-lb-s (4742.5 N-m-s). The basic idea is that if a torque induces a rotation on the ISS, those wheels can rotate about their gimbals to change the angular momentum of the ISS, creating a counter torque. Using CMGs is much more subtle than using thrusters, so microgravity experiments are not impacted. CMGs do have limits, though, so thrusters can assist, if needed. That assistance is needed whenever the torques are large.

To minimize thruster assists, during quiescent operations, we do a type of attitude control called momentum management (MM). This is done by maneuvering the ISS to a torque equilibrium attitude (TEA) that was analyzed by the ground a year or more in advance. This TEA is an attitude that, with meanderings of up to 15 degrees, will result in the gravity torques and atmospheric torques adding up, over an orbit, to close to zero. The CMGs then take up the slack to make that zero.

We often can't be in a TEA during critical operations. For those we need to be in an attitude hold (AH). An example of this is a docking or berthing. Attitude holds are challenging because they require a lot more work, often too much for the CMGs to handle alone, and yet firing thrusters during critical operations can be problematic.

For these operations we design a matrix for the flight rules to ensure safety. For example, we do not allow thrusters to fire whenever the end of the robotic arm is within 2 ft (0.6 m) of the vehicle. The last thing we need is for a thruster firing to shake the arm and cause it to hit the side of a module, puncturing the module. If the timeline indicates the arm will be that close, ADCO (the attitude control flight controller) will inhibit thruster assist.

Dockings and berthings can produce sudden changes in momentum. During these activities we inhibit the entire attitude control system to ensure we do not introduce forces that could damage a docking or berthing mechanism. You might notice, on NASA TV, that the vehicle can get considerably out of attitude at these times.

The attitude control computer (GNC MDM) contains the software that does all of the necessary calculations for attitude control. It takes in the actual attitude and subtracts the commanded attitude to determine the error it needs to correct. It knows the rates of the ISS. That is very sensitive, so sensitive that we can tell when the crew wake up by watching the behavior of the CMGs as the crew start to move around the vehicle. The software also needs a set of user provided parameters such as the vehicle mass properties and inertia tensors. These are located in data slots called CCDBs (controller configuration databases). We have a stockpile of these CCDBs for different vehicle configurations. For example, if a Progress cargo vehicle arrives and docks to the Russian Segment, we will have a CCDB slot designed for that configuration. When it leaves, we will swap to another one."
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Drakkith, pbuk, Tom.G and 4 others
That's super helpful Dave, thank you. :smile:
 
I think we had this as a problem in 8.06. The tidal effect is really, really small.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
I think we had this as a problem in 8.06. The tidal effect is really, really small.
Sorry, what is 8.06?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top