Outsider's semi-informed view
Maybe these smart and talented helpers should be telling students
what is the point of abstract algebra? Perhaps motivation is part of this and other students' problem.
:shy:

Would it be true to say that it is about mathematical
structure? I.e. math is not a collection of facts like Pythagoras' theorem but that or other theorems within a structure of deduction from postulates. That or other theorems may be true within some axiom sets, false in others, meaningless in yet others - and, possibly motivating, more obvious in some than others? Particular systems are put in wider context. Also abstraction unites and relates apparently different things , matrices and graphs, vectors and polynomials?
For this reason abs. algebra has come to influence the terminology and language also of more applicable fields. So when you study vector spaces you will hear of field, groups and rings.
Well I'm saying that as an outsider

- the talented helpers will say if there is anything in it. I, quite long ago in one of my scientific butterflights alighted on and went through a book of abstract algebra and have one or two. It was quite fun for a time to discover that x - x = 0 (or maybe it was x + (-x) = 0 ? Stuff of that kind.) was not, in some systems considered either taken for granted as obvious, nor axiomatic, but was something you could, and had to, prove. After a bit the fun palled because it seemed anodyne - did not seem to lead to the specific structures which are also part of the fascination and usefulness of math, like say the solution of cubic equations or there can be only these 5 Platonic solids etc.
The point of it is that it is abstract and the trouble with it is that it is abstract. Or the other way round.
If motivations are the problem you might dip into whatever is most of interest to you - no obligation to wade through everything - in "Applications of Abstract Algebra" by George Mackiw used from $3.22 at Amazon.