Do you know this property of the logarithm?

azabak
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Playing around with logarithms I found an interesting property that "log b^n(a^n) = log b(a)". Then I tried to find some kind of proof that this is right and not only a coincidence. Ι made a gereral formula for any value of both n's (α and β) so that "log b^β(a^α) = x". Therefore "a^α = b^(β*x)" ; "a = b^(β*x/α)" ; "log b(a) = β*x/α" ; "x = (α/β)*log b(a)". And therefore "log b^β(a^α) = (α/β)*log b(a)".
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
azabak said:
Playing around with logarithms I found an interesting property that "log b^n(a^n) = log b(a)".

It's unclear what that notation is supposed to mean.

Can you write out what "log b^n(a^n)" means in words? Or perhaps master the forums LaTex: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=546968
 
I think you mean "log_{b^n}(a^n)= log_b(a)". That is, that the logarithm, base b^n, of a^n is the same as the logarithm, base b, of a. (Of course, a and b must be positive.)

If y= log_{b^n}(a^n) then a^n= (b^n)^y= b^{ny}= (b^y)^n. Can you complete it now?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top