Do you need to be a math genius to be a math professor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philosopher_k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genius Professor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the journey toward a career in mathematics, particularly the path to becoming a math professor or a quant. The original poster expresses concerns about job prospects in academia and doubts about their potential for significant contributions to the field, such as winning prestigious awards. They outline a plan to pursue a mathematics degree at ANU, followed by a PhD at a top Australian university, and aim for a postdoctoral position before securing a lecturership.Key points include the notion that many successful mathematicians did not foresee their achievements, emphasizing that passion for mathematics is more crucial than accolades. A retired mathematics professor shares insights, stating that while exceptional talents exist, they are not typical among professors. The discussion encourages focusing on enjoyment and dedication to mathematics rather than the pressure of future accolades, suggesting that hard work and finding a supportive supervisor can lead to a fulfilling career in academia.
Philosopher_k
Messages
60
Reaction score
2
I wrote in a previous thread that i would like to get a math phd, but after that become a quant or something. The reason i was set on that projected path was twofold. One i was unsure about the job prospects i.e. numbers involved in getting a full time job as a teacher. The other thing is that i doubt my ability to shape mathematics over my entire career, let's just say i don't see myself winning any prizes like the fields medal or abel. That being said i would still enjoy learning as much mathematics as my ability allows and i wouldn't mind teaching either. So i still see becoming a math professor as a viable option. I have entered various math competitions over the years but have never done very well in them, yet that does not phase me (is this an issue, should i be expecting to score in the top 5% to be considering a career in mathematics?)

So here is my plan. My system is a little different as i am Australian but any advice would be useful.

1. Attend university and major in mathematics from ANU (hopefully graduate with first class honours)
2. Go do my phd at Sydney, Anu, Adelaide, Melbourne
3. Get a postdoc job in USA/ Britain/ New Zealand/ Australia
4. Get a lecturship somewhere, even if it is at a second rate university.
5. Live happily ever after!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to realize that very, very few successful mathematicians had for an idea whether they were going to win any medals or not. Here, let's use Edward Witten as an example: he went through his undergraduate and some time after not even knowing what he wanted to do, then he was introduced to math/physics and started loving it. He now is the undeniable leader of string theory.

My point being, don't let your inaccurate prediction of the future govern your current choices. Surely very few people can predict winning a nobel prize, or a field's medal. Don't let this control you.
 
I am a (recently retired) university mathematics professor. (Therefore one does not have to be a genius to be a professor.) Some of my students who are obviously smarter than I am, did not become professors because they did not love math as much as I did. Because I loved it and wanted to follow that career, I never gave up, in spite of my many struggles.

People with fields or abel medals are really rare. I have met a half dozen or so of them, and they are indeed brilliant. But they are not at all typical professors. They seem to combine natural giftedness in the extreme, the best teachers, and hard work.

If you enjoy doing and teaching mathematics, I hope and believe you will find satisfaction in that career, wherever it takes you. Satisfaction is usually not about riches and fame, although it helps if you earn enough to live on.
 
Last edited:
I guess that won't be necessary. As long as one is working hard and get proper guide, he has the chance to make it. My suggestion is that you should work hard to get into a world top university for phd study, and find an excellent supervisor, then you have a greater chance to get a tenure in the future.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
71
Views
823
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top