Do you think astronomy is a useful science?

  • Thread starter Athalus
  • Start date
  • #1
8
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Personnally I think astronomy, at the present time, is a waste of time for several reasons. The current resources allocated for astronomy range in the billions of dollars. Also the current minds working on astronomy could be doing something far more useful for society. For example we could put these resources in aiding the third world countries. And I don't see why we don't. I think astronomer's should pay more attention to what's around them than what's above. Of course there are mopre reasons, but i'm to lazy to write them down at the moment....

Ultimately astronomy is a waste.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
374
2
Farady was asked in the 1830's "What is the point of your work with Electricity?

He replied "What use is a baby?"

Technological breakthroughs come about because Humans are inquisitive, not because someone has decided what is important and what isn't. Without Science we would all be living in third world countries as there would be no other alternative.
 
  • #3
Janus
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,542
1,289
http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~astro/teachers.htm [Broken]

As to:

"Also the current minds working on astronomy could be doing something far more useful for society."

Any society that would corerce people from their career paths of choice into ones "more useful for society" is not a society worth supporting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,786
7
Funny thing is, the classical Communist countries, like the USSR and PRC, which sacrifice everything else to the party vision, have always found resources to support pure mathematics, astronomy, and "socially worthless" arts like classical music, ballet, and calligraphy. "There are more things (of worth) than are dreamed of in your philosophy".

(edit) Except for the Great Leap Forward, which even the party congress now calls a deviation.
 
  • #5
22
0
Astronomers would be the first to see a giant rock headed for Earth. Pretty useful, I think.
 
  • #6
8
0
^^^^

Great and what could we do about that giant rock headed towards earth, most likely nothing.
 
  • #7
22
0
Send Bruce Willis!
 
  • #8
163
0
Originally posted by Athalus
Ultimately astronomy is a waste.
That's why it's so good. More of us should be engaged in these useless endeavours, and less of us in the useful endeavours (which are mostly about exploiting or harming other people). The other thing, of course, is that what is considered useful, varies with culture and era. Why should I be constrained by cultural norms?

So get out your telescopes and be useless!
 
  • #9
695
0
Also the current minds working on astronomy could be doing something far more useful for society.
Send them all to the gulags!
 
  • #10
Njorl
Science Advisor
258
10
Originally posted by Janus
http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~astro/teachers.htm [Broken]

As to:

"Also the current minds working on astronomy could be doing something far more useful for society."

Any society that would corerce people from their career paths of choice into ones "more useful for society" is not a society worth supporting.
But we do it. By subsidizing astronomy and not funding another branch of science, the government is essentially forcing people into astronomy. In a capitalist society, money does all the pushing and pulling. Subsidies, grants and tax breaks are how the government flexes its muscles.

I believe in the value of basic research. I believe researchers do best doing what they love most. But the government's lavish support of astronomy out of step with its benefit is a self-perpetuating cycle. Spending money on it generates public interest in it which diverts good minds into it. The good minds lobby for funding and get it. This funding is not at the expense of social programs, or the defense budget - it is at the expense of other basic research initiatives.

Njorl
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Phobos
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,939
6
Athalus - Indeed it is difficult to allocate limited resources (money, manhours, etc.) when there are so many problems to contend with in the world. But it does not have to be "either-or". We can do astronomy (and other sciences) AND try to solve the world's problems at the same time. I would say that the US's economic success (and therefore our higher standard of living as compared to empoverished countries) is hand-in-hand with our science & technology. Astronomy is one aspect of that success.

other tidbits...Did you know that...

- the hole in the ozone layer was discovered by astronomers? (something they found while doing research about Venus)

- global warming was a problem discovered by astronomers? (hmm...I forget if that was just in part...I'll have to check)

- at least part of the team that figured out that nuclear winter would be a global catastrophe (thereby altering policies on the use of nukes) were astronomers?

- astronomers transformed human understanding about the universe and our place in it?

- solar astronomy is invaluable for protecting our satellite network (predicting the next solar flare, etc.)


Oh, and about that asteroid thing...there are measures that can be taken to deflect an incoming object. The success of such an attempt would depend on the amount of lead time (the sooner you know, the better). By the time a non-astronomer sees it, it's too late to do anything.
 
  • #12
Phobos
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,939
6
Originally posted by Njorl
But we do it. By subsidizing astronomy and not funding another branch of science, the government is essentially forcing people into astronomy.
The government does fund other branches of science. (but I assume you know that already)

Note that a huge chunk of NASA's budget (half or more) is not for astronomy as a science, but for the shuttle, ISS, and aero-space tech programs.

There are very few professional astronomers in the US (1,000?) and the world (the International Astronomers Union has only 8,600 astronomers from in 84 countries). Jobs are tough to come by.

But the government's lavish support of astronomy
lavish? [?]
the ISS/shuttle/aero programs perhaps, but not the science of astronomy itself...those programs keep getting cut back
 
  • #13
completely off subject...

so compared to the debate you people hve just come up with, this seems a meaningless, self centred question - but I have a general interest in astrology, cosmology, and infact, most of theoretical physics (which you seem to have a knoweldge in) and am in my first year of 6th form college - does any one know of any companies which will fund further education in these sciences, maybe take committed people on as trainees or run dayleave system, or programmes similar to that seen in other non science based career choices
cheers,

ian
 
  • #14
Phobos
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,939
6
not if you confuse astrology with astronomy! :wink:

but seriously, try starting a new topic for this question & you should get some good replies.

thanks
 
  • #15
231
0
The interest in astronimical knowledge is simply a result of our eager to discover. Not that we will use it to anything specific, but humans are born with a mind that wants to learn and explore. It comes naturally. Usefulness irrelevant in my opinion.
 
  • #16
Nereid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,367
1
Keck

oh and BTW, a not insignificant part of the funding for astronomy comes from private sources; for example, the two largest optical telescopes on Earth are called Keck I and Keck II, after none other ...

Historically (at least until last century), most astronomy was privately financed.

Not to get into a 'my use of tax-payer dollars is better than yours' debate, but Athalus and confused_ian, how would you go about defining the allocation of the dollars in the 'Science' part of any country's budget? What would your program be for deciding the overall size of that budget?
 
  • #17
1,490
22
Is astronomy a useful science?

Let's begin with navigation. Until recently, astronomical observation was the only way for ships and airplanes to know where they were when traveling overseas. Now they are guided by global positioning systems also succesfully placed in orbit thanks to astronomical science.

General physics owes many of its basic principles and laws to the research done by Galileo and Newton through telescopes, such as the concepts of inertia and formulas for gravity, understanding of motion, effec ts of friction (by studying objects in space not subject to air resistance etc.).

Relativistic physical concepts such as the speed and nature of light are verified and tested using astronomy and knowledge gained through astronomocal observatiions.

Our whole basis for telling time and dates are based on astronomical observation. Future use of millisecond pulsars may be more accurate for keeping time than atomic clocks.

Chemistry owes the discovery of Helium to astronomy.

Knowledge and prediction of solar activity is important to communications on earth as well as satelite communication and as such is funded by the U.S. Air Force.

Medical imaging (xrays etc) owe many advances to astronomy. For example techniques learned through reconstruction of flawed hubble image aides in earlier detection of tumors in mammograms.

Interferometry (a science developed through astronomy) is used to map ice in the ocean for ship safety, aides in weather predictions and is being tested to try and predict earthquakes.

Lastly, if it wasn't for the science of Astronomy, the earth would still be considered the center of the universe. The diminishment of the earth from the center of the universe to a mere part of a much larger picture, opened the door for the advancement of all science.

Yes, astronomy has value.
 
  • #18
Njorl
Science Advisor
258
10
I did lump the shuttle and space station in with astronomy. It was wrong to do so. I have been in a few discussions about them lately and went on automatic pilot.

Eliminating those white elephants, I would still argue the "usefulness" of spending money on astronomy. I would not argue the value though. There is a bit of a distinction. It is a fine line, but I think this is just where that line is drawn.

Njorl
 
  • #19
Phobos
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,939
6
Originally posted by Njorl
I would still argue the "usefulness" of spending money on astronomy. I would not argue the value though.
Certainly, this could be a big debate. Although the practical usefulness of pure research is not always apparent, time and time again, useful things come out of it. The trick is figuring out how much money to allocate to practical research vs. the more esoteric stuff.
 
  • #20
17
0
astronomy a waste?

Actually, it is a waste if all you can count is pennies.
However, from the perspective of life here on earth; all humankind's need to explore; the need to grow, learn, and excel beyond what can be felt, touched, seen, etc...; the need to belong to something greater than what we can observe, it is imperative.
One must ask the question though-
What are you doing to actually make a contribution to humanity?
Are you feeding the poor, visiting the sick, prisoners, etc...?
Have you sacrificed all that you have to make this planet a better place to live? Is your choice of careers dedicated to making this a better place to live?
The point of exploration towards the cosmos is what drives our economy, and our dreams. Just keep in mind that what gives us computers, and all of our electronics is the research done for space travel from years ago and today.
What about Kevlar, portable battery powered tools, modern sunglass technology, etc...? Anyone on this BBoard could give an endless list of technologies derived from astronomical research. Geez, go to BEST BUY, and look around.
Then we could also state that the work the astronauts on Columbia were doing back in February of last year was of no value. However, I'm sure that most of the planet's population would disagree with that, as was borne out in the news.
I remember a day-- 1960's-- when my dad was an electronics engineer when the only electronic's work was the defense/space industries. There were no other industries that existed to give him work. Now, there are innumerable industries-- all begun to understand the universe we live in.
Can you honestly tell me that you do not find the images sent back by Hubble to absolutely awe inspiring? If so, I pity you, and feel sorry that your ability to experience joy with such indescribable beauty is so tarnished.
So, I put it to you that astronomical research is in fact an absolute necessity for our lives. Without it, dreams would fail, and without dreams, vision for the future would fail, and as a wise king once stated it-- "where there is no vision, the people perish."
Perhaps you need once again to step out into a dark mountain meadow during a new moon, and look up. Try counting just a few stars. If you can honestly get past 100, I'd be awfully surpised. And not for a lack of being able to count. And it cannot be done in rage to spite me, or others who hold to my opinion. Remember, even the likes of Einstien took a few moments to enjoy nature's wonder.
 
  • #21
Phobos
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,939
6
some excerpts from President Bush's speech about his new space initiative...

...[NASA], and the dedicated professionals who serve it, have always reflected the finest values of our country -- daring, discipline, ingenuity, and unity in the pursuit of great goals.
...
America is proud of our space program. The risk takers and visionaries of this agency have expanded human knowledge, have revolutionized our understanding of the universe, and produced technological advances that have benefited all of humanity.
...
America has ventured forth into space for the same reasons. We have undertaken space travel because the desire to explore and understand is part of our character. And that quest has brought tangible benefits that improve our lives in countless ways. The exploration of space has led to advances in weather forecasting, in communications, in computing, search and rescue technology, robotics, and electronics. Our investment in space exploration helped to create our satellite telecommunications network and the Global Positioning System. Medical technologies that help prolong life -- such as the imaging processing used in CAT scanners and MRI machines -- trace their origins to technology engineered for the use in space.
 
  • #22
17
0
response to phobos.

Well stated.
And as a 16 1/2 year suvivor of cancer, I owe my life in part to the research that developed those MRI, CT, PET, and other medical scanners.
And as part of my desire to learn about astronomy/physics, I too am in the beginning stages of developing a solution to the millions with cancer, and have had surgeries that have removed a basic part of their anatomy-- lymph glands.
God willing, with my ideas, one day, those with lymphedema will no longer suffer such a debilitating illness.
And if you do not know what lymphedema is then go to
www.lymphnet.org/
We live because we have to. We dream because we need to. We survey the stars because we choose to. What happens afterwards, is how we survive life's pitfalls.
I hope that one day you will see that astronomy is as important as breathing, eating, and drinking water.
 
  • #23
NASA alone, in either its astrophysics research or space exploration has been responsible for the development of the following:

MRI, lasers (laser eye surgery), neuromuscular stimulation (spinal injuries), ocular screening system, smoke detectors, prosthetics, satellite dish (foxtel), ergonomically designed desks, chairs and workstations, memory foam (matteresses), clothing that are fire-resistant or better at keeping in heat, invisible braces, bar coding, and heaps more.

And that is NASA alone, there are so many more places in the world that research the universe, and most of the discoveries we make lead to better technology being developed here on Earth.

Just because you cannot see "the point", doesn't give you the right to judge something you obviously don't have a clue about.
 
  • #24
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,930
4,680
This thread has been risen from the grave! (It's been almost 8 years since last post)
 

Related Threads on Do you think astronomy is a useful science?

Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Top