DO you think this is real?

  • Thread starter LucasGB
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation is about a graphing calculator website where users can input equations in cartesian form to create words and pictures. The accuracy of the calculator is being questioned, but a pattern is noticed in the equations for different letters. The conversation also discusses the purpose of an additional term and why each term is squared.
  • #1
181
0
Do you guys think this really works?
http://www.xamuel.com/inverse-graphing-calculator.php [Broken]
I wasn't able to verify it with my graphing software.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It looks incredible! Really mind-boggling!
I always wondered if words and pictures could be made out of equations in cartesian form.

I tried the letter O which should have just been a circle radius 1 unit centre (3,3) by the looks of it, and this is what it gives:

[tex]\left((x-3)^2+(y-3)^2-1\right)^2+\left(y^2-6y+8+\sqrt{y^4-12y^3+52y^2-96y+64}\right)^2=0[/tex]

Now, the first part is the correct equation for the circle, but what's this extra nonsense that's tacked on?
 
  • #4
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
So it works?
 
  • #6
That expression is added to the ``formula'' for words and sentences as well. Perhaps it's important to the work; perhaps it's a private joke by the programmer.
 
  • #7
Yes I believe it does work. And once you start to realize the pattern (go for 1 simple letter at first, such as O and X and work your way from there), it's not as unbelievably impossible as you first might have thought - including myself.
 
  • #8
If you look at the structure of the equation for several letters, you will see a pattern emerging, e.g. for 3 letters

[tex] z_1^2 \, z_2^2 \, z_3^2 \, + \, w^2 \, = \, 0 [/tex]​

where z1 is a formula for the first letter, z2 is a formula for the second letter, z3 is a formula for the third letter, and w is always the same each time, and all of them functions of x and y.

Note that the equation is true if and only if w is zero and at least one of the other expressions is zero.

w is zero if [itex]2 \leq y \leq 4[/itex] and otherwise non-zero, so the effect of adding w2 is to prevent any curves being drawn above y=4 or below y=2. In the case of a circle ("O") it doesn't matter, but for some of the other letters, the formula given creates the correct symbol between heights 2 and 4 but also creates extra lines outside that range, so adding w2 suppresses the unwanted lines.
 
  • #10
DrGreg said:
If you look at the structure of the equation for several letters, you will see a pattern emerging, e.g. for 3 letters

[tex] z_1^2 \, z_2^2 \, z_3^2 \, + \, w^2 \, = \, 0 [/tex]​

where z1 is a formula for the first letter, z2 is a formula for the second letter, z3 is a formula for the third letter, and w is always the same each time, and all of them functions of x and y.

Note that the equation is true if and only if w is zero and at least one of the other expressions is zero.

w is zero if [itex]2 \leq y \leq 4[/itex] and otherwise non-zero, so the effect of adding w2 is to prevent any curves being drawn above y=4 or below y=2. In the case of a circle ("O") it doesn't matter, but for some of the other letters, the formula given creates the correct symbol between heights 2 and 4 but also creates extra lines outside that range, so adding w2 suppresses the unwanted lines.

Nice explanation of the mysterious extra term. Thanks DrGreg. :)
 
  • #11
Yeah, nice explanation DrGreg! :smile:

I also cannot comprehend why every term is being squared. What is the effect of this?
 

What is the scientific method?

The scientific method is a systematic approach used to investigate and understand the natural world. It involves making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions.

How do scientists determine if something is real?

Scientists use the scientific method to determine if something is real. This involves conducting experiments and collecting data to support or refute a hypothesis. Additionally, scientific findings must be reproducible by other scientists to be considered real.

Can something be considered real if it cannot be proven scientifically?

In the scientific community, something can only be considered real if it can be proven through the scientific method. This means that there must be evidence and data to support its existence. However, there are some things that may be considered real based on personal beliefs or cultural practices, even if they cannot be scientifically proven.

What is the role of evidence in determining if something is real?

Evidence is crucial in determining if something is real in the scientific community. It provides support for a hypothesis and helps to draw conclusions about the natural world. Without evidence, it is difficult to determine the validity of a claim or idea.

How do scientists account for bias when determining if something is real?

Scientists use rigorous and objective methods to minimize bias when conducting experiments and analyzing data. This includes using control groups, double-blind studies, and peer review processes. Additionally, replication of experiments by other scientists helps to reduce bias and increase confidence in the findings.

Suggested for: DO you think this is real?

Replies
3
Views
657
Replies
2
Views
683
Replies
3
Views
661
Replies
1
Views
699
Replies
5
Views
859
Replies
3
Views
879
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top