Weird Graph Behaviour - Analyzing a Root in Domain 2-4

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a peculiar graph defined by the function y=(x^2-6x+8+√(x^4-12x^3+52x^2-96x+64))^2, which exhibits a root at y=0 for the domain x=[2,4]. The behavior is attributed to the expression under the radical being the square of (x^2-6x+8), making the entire expression equivalent to the absolute value of (x^2-6x+8). This leads to cancellation when (x^2-6x+8) is negative, specifically in the interval 2<x<4. The analysis reveals a clever mathematical trick that simplifies understanding the graph's behavior. Overall, this exploration highlights the interesting properties of the function within the specified domain.
Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
I came across this weird graph from another thread:

y=\left(x^2-6x+8+\sqrt{x^4-12x^3+52x^2-96x+64}\right)^2

It seems that there is a root y=0 for the domain x=[2,4].
I've never seen such weird behaviour on a graph before. How could analysis of this function (or not?) determine that there is a root for all values 2\leq x\leq 4?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That does seem weird, but I have figured out what is going on.

The expression under the radical is the square of (x2-6x+8). So that expression (including the square root) is simply the absolute value of (x2-6x+8).

They cancel whenever (x2-6x+8) is negative, which happens for 2<x<4.
 
Nice one Redbelly :smile:
I like this new little trick, it seems so nifty hehehe

Thanks.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
105
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top