Does a curveball really curve? or is it just an illusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sniperman724
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve
AI Thread Summary
A curveball in baseball does indeed curve due to the physics of spinning. The ball's rotation creates a difference in air pressure on either side, resulting in lateral movement. This phenomenon is explained by the Magnus effect, which describes how spinning objects behave in a fluid. The perception of the curve is not an illusion; it is a real physical effect that players and spectators observe. Understanding this can enhance appreciation for the skill involved in pitching and hitting curveballs.
Sniperman724
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I was just curious because I do actually watch and play baseball, does a curveball actually curve or is it just an illusion of our depth perception.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really does curve!

Because the ball is spinning, the pressure on one side is greater than the other, so it is pushed to the side. For the nitty gritty details, google "Magnus effect".
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Is the Coriolis Effect an Illusion in a Tossed Ball's Motion?
Replies
10
Views
1K
I [Questions] Modeling a Baseball Pitch Trajectory in 3D Space
Replies
1
Views
2K
Why does the Split-finger baseball pitch break?
Replies
8
Views
8K
I Coriolis force, real or just an illusion?
2
Replies
91
Views
8K
B Question about units for "area under curve"
Replies
2
Views
3K
Physics C: Mechanics - Negative Energy and Potential Energy Curves
Replies
5
Views
2K
Understanding the Tomlinson Model of Sliding Friction
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Gravity Illusion: Questions on Space-Time Curvature Granularity
Replies
4
Views
2K
Centripetal force due to banked curves
Replies
8
Views
3K
Why will a pipe pulled around a curve rotate no torque
Replies
18
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top