Does a Hotter Air Molecule Really Rise?

AI Thread Summary
In this thought experiment, three air molecules are stacked vertically in a container, with one molecule moving faster than the others. Upon release, the molecules bounce between the ceiling and floor without changing their horizontal position. After reaching equilibrium, the faster molecule's path will have its ends unequal, with the top end closer to the ceiling and the bottom end further from the floor. This occurs because gravity influences the trajectory of the molecules, causing the slower ones to remain lower. Overall, the dynamics of molecular speed and gravitational effects lead to this unequal distribution in their paths.
omin
Messages
187
Reaction score
1
This is a thought experiment question.

I have three air molecules. Two have the same speed. The third is faster than the other two. When they slam against each other, they keep their previous speed after the rebounding acceleration. I put them in a container. I hold them from wanting to move so I can stack them one atop the other. I stack them with the faster air molecule in the middle. Then I let them go. They only bounce along the vertical axis, from the ceiling to the floor of the container. They do not change velocity into the horizontal or Z cordinate, so they always stay stacked vertically, but still bouncing.

After equilibrium, does the full length of the faster molecule's path have ends equal distance from ceiling to floor or is the top path end closer to ceiling or is the bottom path end closer to floor? And why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Air is a mixture of different gases and temperature is the average kinetic energy of a large number of molecules. Therefore, the question isn't worded all that well. But the answer is, yes, since gravity still affects the trajectory of a moving molecule, slower moving ones will tend to stay closer to the bottom than a faster moving one.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
251
Views
7K
Replies
42
Views
10K
Replies
59
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
9K
Back
Top