Does a Radio Signal Count as a Physical Connection in Competition Rules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chuck7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a team facing a penalty in a competition due to their remote control not being deemed "physically connected" to their device. The participant argues that the connection between the remote and the antenna should qualify as a physical connection. However, responses suggest that this interpretation may not hold, comparing it to distant connections like electromagnetic waves. It is recommended to consult with a team leader for clarity on the rules and to present the case to the judges for reconsideration. The urgency of the situation highlights the importance of understanding competition rules thoroughly.
chuck7
[SOLVED] Not quite homework but VERY URGENT!

Some of you may be familiar with creative problem solving programs like Odyssey of the Mind and Destination ImagiNation, which is the one I participate in. For the problem our team had to do, we made a device that uses a radio control from an RC car to open and close a pneumatic valve. In the rules of the problem it states that anything that powers or controls the device must be "included on the device" and also all parts of the device must be "physically connected". We got about a 60 point penalty out of 300 total points because our remote control was not "physically connected". Wouldn't the connection between the remote and the antenna be a physical connection, or does that not count? Please help, we have to take this to the judges tomorrow morning if we want to get our points back.

Thanks so much,
Charles
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, but I don't think you have much of a case. By your reasoning, the Earth and the Crab Nebula are physically connected by virtue of the electromagnetic waves reaching us from there.
 


Hi Charles,

Thank you for sharing your experience with us. It sounds like you and your team have put a lot of effort into your project and I'm sorry to hear that you received a penalty. In this case, it is best to consult with your team leader or coach to get a clear understanding of the rules and see if there is any room for interpretation. It's also a good idea to bring up your concerns to the judges and explain your reasoning behind considering the connection between the remote and antenna as a physical connection. Best of luck with your presentation and I hope you are able to get your points back. Keep up the good work!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top