Does a shrinking disk grow in the z-direction?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wonfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disk
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a thin, flat disk made from a material with increasing density, specifically addressing whether the disk, which shrinks radially, also grows in the z-direction. Participants explore the implications of isotropic density changes, the nature of the chemical reaction involved, and the effects of thermal conditions on the disk's geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant observes that the disk shrinks radially while appearing to grow slightly in the z-direction, questioning whether this is a predicted behavior or an experimental artifact.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the model, asking how the density is increasing—whether through material accretion or dimensional changes.
  • A participant explains that the density increase results from a chemical reaction where the products are denser than the reactants, specifying the disk's dimensions.
  • Concerns are raised about the isotropic nature of the material, with one participant suggesting that if it remains isotropic, the dimensions should not change disproportionately.
  • Another participant proposes that the exothermic nature of the reaction could lead to thermal expansion in the z-direction, questioning the isothermal conditions of the disk.
  • One participant speculates that differential cooling rates could induce stresses, suggesting an experiment with a thermal jacket to relieve these stresses.
  • A participant discusses the movement of atoms during the chemical reaction, emphasizing the relevance of the disk's surface area in the reaction dynamics.
  • Another participant highlights the importance of continuum mechanics in understanding the disk's behavior, noting that the geometry complicates the assumption of isotropy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of isotropic versus anisotropic behavior, the effects of thermal conditions, and the underlying continuum mechanics. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the observed phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the assumptions of isotropy and continuity, as well as the complexities introduced by the chemical reaction and thermal dynamics. These factors contribute to the uncertainty in predicting the disk's behavior.

wonfish
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework question! I am observing that a thin, flat disk made from a material whose density is gradually increasing, shrinks in the radial direction (of course) but appears to grow very slightly in the z-direction. The change in density is supposed to be isotropic.

Is growth in the z-direction predicted or an artifact of my experiment? I don't know enough continuum mechanics to solve this problem or even how to search for a solution. Is the solution to this problem somewhere in the literature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not clear about your model. How is the density increasing? Is it actually accreting material or is it changing dimensions? Are you thinking of a massive astronomical body?
 
Actually its a chemical reaction where the product are denser than the reactants. And the size of my disk is about a cm in diameter and a few mm in height. We can detect size differences down to a couple nm.
 
If the material remains isotropic / amorphous then I can't see what could change the ratio of its dimensions.
 
Is the reaction possibly exothermic and the disc is heating up and expanding in the z direction from the heat?
 
So it's anisotropic then?
 
The reaction is exothermal, but the disc is kept isothermal. And the material is isotropic. The reaction takes days. It's the geometry that puzzles me. The problem is then a disc that is subjected to constant forces in the radial direction that also has a time changing density. (The internal forces caused by the change is density can be equated to external forces pushing on the disc -- I think.)

If it were a parallelpiped I would agree that the shrinkage would be proportional to the dimensions since the forces would be proportional. But it's the radial shrinkage that puzzles me. Can all the material fit into the shrinking circle, or does some have to pop out into the z-direction, even with the shrinkage forces in the z-direction.
 
If the material were truly isotropic then it would expand and contract by the same amount in all directions. But, because it is exothermic, I imagine that the periphery could be at a different temperature from the centre temperature (i.e. cooling down faster). This could lead to the rim contracting and squeezing the centre - prior to solidifying or increasing its modulus. This would / could induce stresses

Could you do the experiment in some sort of thermal jacket which would cool very slowly? This would / could relieve the differential stresses. Would it be worthwhile heating the disc up again and seeing if it changed shape as these stresses, if they exist, could even out - a sort of annealing/
 
If you are using a chemical reaction which has an end-product which has a higher density than the initial reactants, then some transfer of material is occurring as a result of the chemical action. Even if it is internal to the structure, there is some movement of atoms, even if only from one crystal structure to another.

Is the disk made of one of the reactants, and it is immersed in the other reactant, or is the disk made of a mixture of reactants? This is very relevant, because the main asymmetry in the disk from the standpoint of a chemical reaction is the much larger surface area of the top of the disk relative to the surface area of its sides.

I suspect that the reason why you are seeing an increase in the z-direction is either because the larger surface area on top of the disk allows more reactants to meet there or because it allows more heat transfer there (since you said you are cooling an exothermic process).
 
  • #10
Its a very uniform mixture of reactants. It is kept isothermal. The question comes down to continuum mechanics. Even though we can assume the material to be isotropic, due to the requirement of the disc being continuus, the geometry of the system is not. If the restraint of continuity weren't there, the material would shrink into a powder. But molecular forces keep the material together. What I am looking for is the solution to the continuum mechanics problem of a disk with nonconstant density.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K