Does a Universal Neutron Range Graph Exist for Various Materials?

David Sosa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

Is there such a thing as range graph as a function of the energy for the neutrons in matter? I have been looking for it all over the web, but I just found the cross sections plotted when the neutron comes from different reactions. Is there a more general graph that discribes the distance a neutron would travel in different materials as a function of its energy?? Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neutrons do not have a range in matter the way charged particles do. It is theoretically possible for neutrons to diffuse through any shielding, though it is unlikely if the shield is thick enough. However, neutron attenuation is roughly exponential.
 
Hey probably should have been more specific. I do realize that neutrons won't interact with matter in the same way as charged particles. However I would like to know what is the probability that a neutron would be detected, for example in a scintillator or a thin material. I think this is possible, even if the rate is extremely low. So that is why I was asking if there exists kind of a "Bethe" plot for neutrons. Thank you.
 
David Sosa said:
Hey probably should have been more specific. I do realize that neutrons won't interact with matter in the same way as charged particles. However I would like to know what is the probability that a neutron would be detected, for example in a scintillator or a thin material. I think this is possible, even if the rate is extremely low. So that is why I was asking if there exists kind of a "Bethe" plot for neutrons. Thank you.
The range depends on the neutron energy and the type of material. Neutron detectors would contain hydrogenous material because the neutron could lose almost all its kinetic energy to a proton, or a large portion thereof.

The range depends on the macroscopic absorption and scattering cross-sections which depend on the isotopic vector of the media through which the neutron passes. Cross-sections of nuclides are also energy dependent.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top