Does a_n Converge to Zero Given b_n Approaches Zero and a_n/b_n Approaches L?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion proves that if the limit of the ratio \( \frac{a_n}{b_n} \) approaches a finite number \( L \), while \( b_n \) approaches zero and is non-zero for all \( n \), then \( a_n \) must converge to zero. The proof utilizes the Squeeze Theorem and properties of limits, demonstrating that as \( b_n \) approaches zero, the bounds on \( a_n \) derived from the inequalities involving \( L \) and \( b_n \) lead to \( a_n \) converging to zero. Key steps include manipulating inequalities and applying the definition of limits effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and convergence in sequences
  • Familiarity with the Squeeze Theorem
  • Knowledge of manipulating inequalities in mathematical proofs
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, particularly with sequences and series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Squeeze Theorem in detail to understand its applications
  • Learn about the properties of limits, specifically in the context of sequences
  • Explore examples of sequences that converge to zero and their proofs
  • Investigate the implications of finite limits in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced calculus concepts, particularly those focusing on sequences and limits.

alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Prove: if $\frac{a_n}{b_n}\to L$, $b_n\neq 0$ for any $n$, and $b_n\to 0$, then $a_n\to 0$. ($L$ represents a finite number, not $\infty$.)

My working:

Given $\epsilon>0$,

$\left|\frac{a_n}{b_n}-L\right|<\epsilon$ and $|b_n|<\epsilon$

How do I proceed?

---------- Post added at 11:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:55 AM ----------

Let me give it a shot.

$\left|\frac{a_n}{b_n}\right|=\left|\frac{a_n}{b_n}-L+L\right|\le\left|\frac{a_n}{b_n}-L\right|+|L|<\epsilon+|L|$

$|a_n|<|b_n|(\epsilon+|L|)<\epsilon(\epsilon+|L|)<\epsilon(1+|L|)$

since we may assume $\epsilon<1$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

Let us take \( \varepsilon = 1 \) there is a large enough integer \( N \) such that if \( n\geq N \) then, \( \big| \frac{a_n}{b_n} - L \big | < \varepsilon = 1 \). This means that (opening up the absolute value),

$$ -1 < \frac{a_n}{b_n} - L < 1 \implies L-1 < \frac{a_n}{b_n} < L+1 $$

Now multiply both sides by \( b_n \), but be careful! If \( b_n \) happens to be negative the inequality gets reversed. Therefore, this means that, \( (L-1)b_n < a_n < (L+1)b_n \) if \(b_n > 0 \) and \( n\geq N \). And that \( (L+1)b_n < a_n < (L-1)b_n \) if \( b_n < 0 \) and \( n\geq N \).

Now as \( b_n \to 0\) by the Squeeze Theorem the sequence \( a_n \to 0\) also (notice that whether \( b_n \) is positive or negative does not matter as in both cases these sequences are going to zero anyway).
 
Here's one way to proceed:

First, we can rewrite the first inequality as:

$$-\epsilon<\frac{a_n}{b_n}-L<\epsilon$$

Multiplying by $b_n$ (note that $b_n$ is positive since we are given $b_n\neq 0$) gives:

$$-b_n\epsilon<a_n-Lb_n<b_n\epsilon$$

Since we are also given that $b_n\to 0$, we know that for any $\delta>0$, there exists an $N$ such that for all $n>N$, $|b_n|<\delta$. So, let's choose $\delta = \frac{\epsilon}{2|L|}$ (note that we can make this choice since we are given that $L$ is finite, not $\infty$).

Then, for all $n>N$, we have $|b_n|<\frac{\epsilon}{2|L|}$, which implies that $b_n\epsilon<\frac{\epsilon^2}{2|L|}$. So, we have:

$$-b_n\epsilon<a_n-Lb_n<\frac{\epsilon^2}{2|L|}$$

Now, we can add $Lb_n$ to all parts of the inequality to get:

$$L-\frac{\epsilon^2}{2|L|}<a_n<L+\frac{\epsilon^2}{2|L|}$$

Since $\epsilon^2$ is positive, we can rewrite this as:

$$L-\frac{\epsilon^2}{2|L|}<a_n<L+\frac{\epsilon^2}{2|L|}$$

Now, since $|L|$ is finite (we are given that $L$ is finite, not $\infty$), we can choose $\epsilon$ small enough so that $\frac{\epsilon^2}{2|L|}<\frac{\epsilon}{2}$. This gives us:

$$L-\frac{\epsilon}{2}<a_n<L+\frac{\epsilon}{2}$$

But this is exactly the definition of $a_n\to L$. So, for any $\epsilon>0$, we can find an $N$ such that for all $n>N$, $|a_n-L|<\epsilon$, which means that $a_n\to L$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K