Does an AC current have to cross zero?

AI Thread Summary
AC current is defined by its ability to vary, while DC current remains constant or changes sign. A current that does not cross zero is typically classified as DC, even if it has an AC component due to superimposed signals. Discussions reveal that many agree on the distinction, noting that DC sources can have small AC ripples without being classified as AC. Capacitor discharges are often viewed as transient waveforms and not strictly AC. Overall, the definitions of AC and DC can vary, but practical applications often consider DC with high ripple as still being DC unless it goes negative.
JorisL
Messages
489
Reaction score
189
So my question is simple.
If the current doesn't change sign, is it considered AC or DC?

I seem to recall we called it DC when I briefly saw it.
However after a quick google search I'm confused. Some said that for example an AC signal offset with a DC signal to show this behaviour should be called AC because there is an AC component.
But then there was the odd example of a capacitor discharging. I absolutely do not agree with that being an AC signal.

In fact I'm reluctant to accept the first one too. Say we have 2 DC sources which we can add together.
If we let one of them be turned on and off periodically (simple example would be an on/off switch).
How can you say it's got an AC component there?

Is there any consensus on this problem of nomenclature?
Joris
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That's more a matter of definitions, which can vary.

Most DC sources that originate from a wall outlet (through various electronics) will have a small AC ripple. No one calls these AC.

AC sources can also have an offset so that their peak to peak is not centered relative to zero voltage or zero current.

AC and DC are more conventions than rigorous universal definitions that can be used to categorize less standard sources and signals.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
As Dr, C says, there is probably not a universal agreement on the answer to your question. I'm in the camp that considers a varying current or voltage to be AC, with a potential DC offset.

One thing that helps to justify this is the way that most signal generators are set up. As you can see on the HP 33120 front panel below, you have separate settings for the (AC) Amplitude and DC Offset. :smile:

http://www.us-instrument.com/objects/catalog/product/image/img1807.jpg
http://www.us-instrument.com/objects/catalog/product/image/img1807.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Dr. Courtney
Indeed that might be more natural given how equipment handles these thing.

What about the second example where a capacitor discharges (once).
Would you say it's AC or DC?
I figure this would be DC since it's not really sharing the wavelike nature (in my eyes that is).

I'm mainly asking this because for a pedagogics class we have to "design a lesson on how AC-generators work".
To anticipate I was thinking how to actually differentiate between AC and DC. The latter they know.
AC has been introduced in a way that many won't remember (as an aside inside the textbook).

Better safe than spread misinformation.
 
JorisL said:
What about the second example where a capacitor discharges (once).
Would you say it's AC or DC?
That's a "transient" waveform. :smile:
 
I shall tread lightly with respect to this.
Luckily they don't see capacitors, I believe.

Thanks a lot both of you!
 
  • Like
Likes Dr. Courtney and berkeman
For most practical purposes, DC current with high ripple is still considered DC unless it goes negative. This is important with capacitors. Capacitors can naturally handle AC current but not AC voltage (for types like electrolytic, tantalum, etc). So a DC voltage with some AC ripple is fine as long as the voltage doesn't reverse. The current will naturally be AC (charge up and discharge) but the voltage must never reverse.
 
  • Like
Likes vk6kro
Back
Top