Does an iron ring shield a static magnetic field?

AI Thread Summary
An iron ring can shield a static magnetic field by providing a lower-reluctance path for magnetic flux, resulting in a reduced magnetic field in adjacent areas. This occurs because the iron, being a ferromagnet, allows the field lines to pass through it more easily than through air. The concept parallels electric circuits, where magnetic reluctance is analogous to electrical resistance. While the iron ring can effectively reduce the magnetic field, it does not completely eliminate it, as magnetic flux is less confined than electric current. Understanding this phenomenon requires a grasp of magnetic reluctance and its implications for magnetic circuits.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi.
This picture shows an iron ring shielding a static magnetic field:
hufeisen_feld_ri_magnetfeld_ver.gif

Does this really work, and why? I know that a conductor can shield an electric field (Faraday cage) and a changing magnetic field (Lenz's law), but why would it shield a static field? Especially since iron is a ferromagnet.
 

Attachments

  • hufeisen_feld_ri_magnetfeld_ver.gif
    hufeisen_feld_ri_magnetfeld_ver.gif
    2.5 KB · Views: 957
Physics news on Phys.org
"It can" is a better answer than "it will". The field lines go through the iron and not the air.
 
greypilgrim said:
Hi.
This picture shows an iron ring shielding a static magnetic field:
View attachment 238637
Does this really work, and why? I know that a conductor can shield an electric field (Faraday cage) and a changing magnetic field (Lenz's law), but why would it shield a static field? Especially since iron is a ferromagnet.
The iron ring will provide a lower-reluctance path to the magnetic flux so areas to the right of the ring will have a much lower B field than were the ring absent.

Magnetic circuits are analogous to electric ones: substitute mmf for emf, reluctance for resistance, flux for current, permeability for resistivity, etc. The main difference is that magnetic flux is not nearly so well confined to its "conductor" (a low-reluctance path) as current is to wire.
 
You can understand this phenomenon from the perspective of magnetic reluctance. But I think the description from the book is more accurate.
微信图片_20200421141140.jpg
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top