Does an iron ring shield a static magnetic field?

AI Thread Summary
An iron ring can shield a static magnetic field by providing a lower-reluctance path for magnetic flux, resulting in a reduced magnetic field in adjacent areas. This occurs because the iron, being a ferromagnet, allows the field lines to pass through it more easily than through air. The concept parallels electric circuits, where magnetic reluctance is analogous to electrical resistance. While the iron ring can effectively reduce the magnetic field, it does not completely eliminate it, as magnetic flux is less confined than electric current. Understanding this phenomenon requires a grasp of magnetic reluctance and its implications for magnetic circuits.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi.
This picture shows an iron ring shielding a static magnetic field:
hufeisen_feld_ri_magnetfeld_ver.gif

Does this really work, and why? I know that a conductor can shield an electric field (Faraday cage) and a changing magnetic field (Lenz's law), but why would it shield a static field? Especially since iron is a ferromagnet.
 

Attachments

  • hufeisen_feld_ri_magnetfeld_ver.gif
    hufeisen_feld_ri_magnetfeld_ver.gif
    2.5 KB · Views: 960
Physics news on Phys.org
"It can" is a better answer than "it will". The field lines go through the iron and not the air.
 
greypilgrim said:
Hi.
This picture shows an iron ring shielding a static magnetic field:
View attachment 238637
Does this really work, and why? I know that a conductor can shield an electric field (Faraday cage) and a changing magnetic field (Lenz's law), but why would it shield a static field? Especially since iron is a ferromagnet.
The iron ring will provide a lower-reluctance path to the magnetic flux so areas to the right of the ring will have a much lower B field than were the ring absent.

Magnetic circuits are analogous to electric ones: substitute mmf for emf, reluctance for resistance, flux for current, permeability for resistivity, etc. The main difference is that magnetic flux is not nearly so well confined to its "conductor" (a low-reluctance path) as current is to wire.
 
You can understand this phenomenon from the perspective of magnetic reluctance. But I think the description from the book is more accurate.
微信图片_20200421141140.jpg
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top