Does anyone know how to resolve forces in 3 directions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FailedPaper5712
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around resolving forces in three dimensions, specifically focusing on a vector represented by the displacement i+2j-k. Participants are exploring how to approach this problem within the context of vector mathematics and physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to resolve a vector in three dimensions. Some participants suggest looking up concepts related to tensors and the dot product, while others encourage a geometrical understanding of vector components.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing suggestions for further research and encouraging the exploration of foundational concepts. There is no explicit consensus on a specific method or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are engaging with the problem under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the extent of direct assistance provided.

FailedPaper5712
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
3 dimensional vectors
Relevant Equations
I have been given a question as follows :
A force 𝐹=2𝑖 +3𝑗 +𝑘 N moves a particle from 𝑟1=𝑖+2𝑗 m to 𝑟2=2𝑖 +4𝑗−𝑘 m.
Find the component of 𝐹 in the direction of the displacement. Give your answer to 3.s.f
I know the direction of the displacement is: i+2j-k, but I do not know how to resolve in 3 dimensions. If anyone knows how to do this could they please help me. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please look up 'tensor' and maybe show a little more work.
 
sysprog said:
Please look up 'tensor' and maybe show a little more work.
thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
The component of a vector in a particular direction is the dot product of the vector with the unit vector in that direction. You should be able to rationalise this with a geometrical argument (how is the dot product defined?).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Abhishek11235, berkeman and sysprog

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
794
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
936
Replies
2
Views
1K