Does anyone know this equation? (fluid dynamics, Stokes law)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the equation for corrected viscosity in fluid dynamics, specifically Stokes law, represented as mu_c = mu[1 - 2.104 d/D + 2.09 (d/D)^3 - 0.95 (d/D)^5]. This equation accounts for the influence of pipe diameter on viscosity when a sphere is dropped through a pipe. The equation's origin is speculated to be linked to Faxen's work, and it resembles a Taylor series expansion. Participants in the forum seek to confirm the equation's acceptance and origin.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stokes law in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with viscosity and its calculations
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansions
  • Basic principles of fluid flow in pipes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of Faxen's corrections for viscosity
  • Study the application of Taylor series in fluid dynamics
  • Explore the effects of pipe diameter on fluid viscosity
  • Examine the use of falling ball viscometers in viscosity measurement
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid dynamics, mechanical engineers, and researchers focusing on viscosity measurements and corrections in fluid flow systems.

astro111
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was doing some research into my coursework (don't worry, this isn't a real 'help!' thread) on Stokes law, and I found this equation on this forum (posted in 2010), regarding the effect of the walls of a pipe on the calculated value for viscosity when a sphere is dropped through that pipe (sorry if that doesn't make sense!). The equation supposedly gives an approximate correction for that value of viscosity, taking into account the diameter of the pipe.
The equation is: mu_c = mu[1 - 2.104 d/D + 2.09 (d/D)^3 - 0.95 (d/D)^5]
where mu_c is the corrected viscosity, d is the diameter of the sphere and D the diameter of the pipe.

Does anyone know the origin of this equation, or whether it is accepted? I've been googling it for the past half an hour, but I'm yet to find anything! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed, however I was wondering if anyone knew where the equation originally came from (or whether it was simply devised by the website linked in that thread).

I've heard something about it being derived by someone called Faxen?
 
Without knowing anything about it, that equation looks very much like a Taylor series expansion of some odd function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K