I Does Black Hole Evaporation Violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

AI Thread Summary
Black holes evaporate by emitting virtual particles, leading to a decrease in their mass and energy. This process raises questions about entropy, as a shrinking black hole appears to reduce entropy, potentially violating the second law of thermodynamics. The discussion draws a parallel to freezing water, which also decreases entropy without violating thermodynamic laws. The key inquiry is whether the same principles that apply to freezing water can be extended to black holes. Understanding this relationship is crucial for reconciling black hole evaporation with thermodynamic laws.
Einstein's Cat
Messages
182
Reaction score
2
Hawking showed that black holes dissipate energy when virtual particles are "emitted" by black holes and therefore black holes evaporate. However it seems to me that a shrinking black hole means a decrease in entropy and thus a violation of the second law of thermodynamics; is this the case?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Einstein's Cat said:
Hawkings showed that black holes dissipate energy when virtual particles are "emitted" by black holes and therefore black holes evaporate.

Hawkings didn't do this. Hawking did,

Einstein's Cat said:
However it seems to me that a shrinking black hole means a decrease in entropy

Freezing water does the same thing.

Einstein's Cat said:
nd thus a violation of the second law of thermodynamics

Does freezing water violate the second law? If not, why not? And does the same explanation apply to black holes?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top