Does captured light increase a black hole's mass?

AI Thread Summary
Captured light, such as photons, does increase a black hole's mass due to the principle of mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²). When a photon enters a black hole, it loses its identity and contributes to the overall mass of the black hole, becoming part of its gravitational influence. General Relativity supports this by describing mass-energy as a source of curvature in space-time. Consequently, the energy from captured photons enhances the black hole's mass-energy and gravitational pull. Ultimately, once inside, photons cannot escape and do not return as individual entities.
Decimator
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
As energy cannot be created or destroyed, what happens to a black hole that captures a photon? Does the black hole's mass increase by the energy of the photon? Or is the photon simply trapped there, and then escape when the black hole finally evaporates from hawking radiation?

Or something else entirely?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
E=mc2 so yes captured energy does increase a BH's mass
 
The photon looses its identity upon entering the Black Hole. It is lumped into the Black Hole's mass and will not come out again as itself so far as we know.

Hope that helps :p
 
Mordred said:
E=mc2 so yes captured energy does increase a BH's mass

Just a comment, General Relativity uses "mass-energy" and a source to cause "curvature" in space-time (or if you like it better this way: a source of "gravity")

Therefore, yes, photons, as they carrying energy, they will increase the mass-energy of the black hole. (and therefore it's gravity)
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top