Does Carrying a Cellphone on a Waist Belt Reduce Microwave Radiation to the Brain?

AI Thread Summary
Carrying a cellphone on a waist belt may reduce microwave radiation exposure to the brain due to the inverse square law, which states that radiation intensity decreases with distance. At 50 cm, the radiation reaching the head is significantly less than at 1 cm, with estimates suggesting about 1 mW from a 1 W cellphone. While there is no evidence of brain damage from cellphones, using a headset and keeping the phone away from the head can lower exposure. The combined exposure from a cellphone and Bluetooth device could still total around 2 mW. The discussion highlights the complexity of radiation patterns and the varying power outputs of devices like laptops and Bluetooth headsets.
Abiologist
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Dear All,
Please excuse my ignorance of physics. According to some Russian research 1 mW of microwave radiation could be considered safe for the brain (ie. it won't cause brain damage). I therefore considered that if a 1 W cellphone is damaging to the brain then perhaps it's a good idea to use a 1 mW Bluetooth earphone (which has a range of 1 m) and carry the cellphone on a waist belt. My question is - how much microwave radiation will reach the brain anyway from the waist-carried cellphone ? In other words if the cellphone is giving out 1 W of microwaves - then how much (roughly) less will reach the brain if the cellphone is 50 cm away compared with only 1 cm ?

I look forward to your answers. Many thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The radiation falls of as an inverse square law, so for every doubling of distance the radiation is 1/4 as much.

The easiest way to picture it is to imagine a sphere expanding out from the cell phone.
So at 50cm away the sphere will have a radius of 50cm and a surface area of 4 pi r^2 (or 32000cm^2) so each cm^2 at the distance of your head receives 1/32000 of the total energy, if you head is roughy 20x20cm, it has a cross sectiona area of 400cm^2 and so gets about 1% of the total area of the sphere and so 1% of the radiation.

In reality it's a bit more complicated depending on the exact pattern of radiation from the antennae.

There's no evidence of damage to your brain from a cell phone and no obvious mechanism. But keeping the phone on a belt and using a headset would reduce the power at your head.
 
Many thanks for your reply. So I suppose that the difference between 1 cm and 32 cm is 5 doublings - which means that the radiation difference is 0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 which would be about 1 mW from a 1 W cellphone. I suppose this is good news except that your brain would be receiving 1 mW from the bluetooth and 1 mW from the cellphone = 2 mW. On a similar note does anyone know the wattage of the microwave transmitter found in a Fujitsu Siemens laptop which can be used as wireless internet connection to a modem 5 m away ?
 
The power limit for Wifi is 1Watt, for bluetooth it is 100mw for 100m range class 1 devices or 1mw for class 3.
Agin it is complicated by the antenae design and the system can reduce the power if it can get an acceptable signal to noise
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top