Does circular swinging increase the distance of a throw?

  • Thread starter Thread starter null void
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circular increase
AI Thread Summary
Circular swinging enhances the distance of a throw by increasing the initial velocity of the object at release, as it allows for greater acceleration over a longer path. The rotational energy generated during the swing translates into kinetic energy, which contributes to the object's linear velocity. This process requires less force compared to a standard throw, as the thrower can apply force over an extended distance in a circular motion. While rotational energy itself does not directly increase throw distance, it can contribute to effects like backspin that may enhance aerodynamics. Ultimately, utilizing circular swinging techniques can significantly improve throwing performance.
null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1
It is like the throws in hammer throw, when an object is swung circularly, the it does contains an rotational energy right? when it is release, how the energy affect the objects? Does the energy change to velocity tangent to the circular path it swung?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point in swinging is to increase the initial velocity of the object at the moment of release. That velocity is equal to the instantenous tangential velocity in circular motion. Swinging around allows the thrower more time to accelerate the object.
Initial velocity, of course, translates into increased distance travelled, as per the equations of motion.

If you'd rather think of it in terms of energy, then swinging around means that there is virtually an unlimited path(a closed circle) on which a relatively low force supplied by the thrower can perform work on the system(thrower+object) to increase its rotational energy.
At the moment of release, the rotational energy is transferred to the two components of the system(thrower+object) as kinetic energy. Higher kinetic energy means higher initial velocity, which, again, means farther throw.
Compare with throwing just by using one's arm's length - it would require much higher force to impart the object with the same amount of energy, as the distance over which the work can be performed is very limited.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Understood, thanks
 
Bandersnatch said:
If you'd rather think of it in terms of energy, then swinging around means that there is virtually an unlimited path(a closed circle) on which a relatively low force supplied by the thrower can perform work on the system(thrower+object) to increase its rotational energy.
The purpose of this process is to increase the objects linear kinetic energy (speed^2). Energy = force x distance, and the distance in this case is a unlimited path.

The rotational energy won't increase the distance of a throw directly, other than if there's backspin, you could get some amount of aerodynamic lift (magnus effect).
 
Isn't that what I said in the next sentence?
 
rcgldr said:
The purpose of this process is to increase the objects linear kinetic energy (speed^2). Energy = force x distance, and the distance in this case is a unlimited path.

Bandersnatch said:
Isn't that what I said in the next sentence?
It wasn't clear if you meant the rotational energy with respect to the center of the circular path of the object (KE = 1/2 m R^2 ω^2, where R = radius of circular path), or the rotational energy of the object itself (KE = 1/5 m r^2 ω^2, where r = radius of object).
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top