Does Conservation of Momentum Apply to Electron/Atom Interactions?

AI Thread Summary
Conservation of momentum applies to electron-atom interactions, similar to classical mechanics, despite the quantum characteristics of electrons. When an electron collides with an atom, momentum is conserved, and the atom can indeed be displaced by the electron beam. The emitter of the electron plasma will experience recoil thrust, affirming the principle of momentum conservation. Quantum effects may introduce minor corrections, particularly when electrons are bound in interactions. Overall, the fundamental laws of physics, including momentum conservation, remain applicable in these scenarios.
cremor
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
Electrons have a theoretical rest mass. They can move at varying speeds through space, unlike photons. They ehxhibit quantum-characteristics in their behavior. If an electron collides with, say, an atom, does conservation of momentum apply in the classical sense or does measurable mass (an atom nucleus) evade this effect, and the energy exchange is effected only in the directly unmeasurable way, in this instance for example electron-electron momentum change (among other effects)?

In case I ask it too vaguely, if you fire electron plasma towards an atom in a void, does the atom get blasted out of the jet's way, or is its movement in space left unperturbed? Turn this around, should the electron emitter experience recoil thrust from firing the plasma?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything you say can be treated essentially classically, except that one may perhaps have to add small quantum corrections. The quantum behavior starts to begin nontrivially only when the electrons is or can be bound in the process.
 
There's nothing special about electrons in this regard. Shoot a beam of anything, including light, and you will have recoil. Conservation of momentum is one of the most important and general laws.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top