Does correlation affect the expectation value of a sum?

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
We have for two random variables X and Y (one sum runs over j and one over k):

E(X+Y) = ƩƩ(xj+yk)P(X=xk,Y=yk)
= ƩƩxjP(X=xk,Y=yk) + ƩƩykP(X=xk,Y=yk)

Now this can be simplified to obtain E(X+Y)=E(X)+E(Y) if we use that:
P(X=xk,Y=yk) = P(X=xk)P(Y=yk), because then (and same goes the other way around):
ƩjP(Y=yk)P(X=xj)= P(Y=yk)

But all this requires X and Y to be uncorrelated. Does the derivation above also hold if generally:

P(xj,yk)=P(xj l Y=yk)P(Y=yk)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which indexes are varying on each of your summation signs isn't clear.

I suggest you rewrite your question using the forums LaTex. (See https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3977517&postcount=3)

Calculating the expected value of the sum of two variables using their joint distribution does not depend on whether the two variables are independent or not. "Correlation" is also not relevant.
 
Work with your original double sum - you should find the result of interest is true in each case (as long as expectations exist for your distributions)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top