Does Density Affect Sound Velocity in Condensed Matter?

AI Thread Summary
Density does affect sound velocity in condensed matter, but it is not the sole factor; compressibility and elastic properties also play significant roles. Sound travels faster in denser materials like water and iron compared to air, primarily due to their higher bulk modulus. While higher density can slow sound speed, the impact of compressibility can counterbalance this effect. The relationship is defined mathematically by the equation c=√(K/ρ), where c is sound speed, K is bulk modulus, and ρ is density. Temperature is also a contributing factor to sound velocity in various media.
B4ssHunter
Messages
178
Reaction score
4
does density affect sound velocity ?
i know sound velocity is dependent on inertial and elastic properties
but does it depend on density ?
or just molecular mass ?
if two objects having the same atomic mass , but one has higher density than the other due to the difference in bonding
wouldn't velocity of sound be greater in the one with higher density ?
i understand that velocity of sound decreases in larger atoms , because they have more mass, but wouldn't that be accompanied by larger volume causing their density to actually decrease ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi there :)

yes it does, for a couple of examples... in water the speed of sound is ~ 4 times faster than in air and
in iron its ~ 15 times faster than in air.
Sound is a compression wave so in in any given medium there are 3 factors that affect the propagation speed ...
1) compressibility... 2) shear modulus and 3) density

edit: ... I should really mention that temperature also plays a part
cheers
Dave
 
davenn said:
hi there :)

yes it does, for a couple of examples... in water the speed of sound is ~ 4 times faster than in air and
in iron its ~ 15 times faster than in air.
Sound is a compression wave so in in any given medium there are 3 factors that affect the propagation speed ...
1) compressibility... 2) shear modulus and 3) density

edit: ... I should really mention that temperature also plays a part
cheers
Dave
excuse but i read that actually what makes sound travel faster in iron is the elasticity not the density , i read also that density slows it down
 
its a mixture of the 3 things I mentioned above


i read also that density slows it down

yes but the compressibility then plays a big role on the which can make up for the drop in speed as the density increases

have a look at the wiki page for a pretty good description
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound

Dave
 
davenn said:
hi there :)

yes it does, for a couple of examples... in water the speed of sound is ~ 4 times faster than in air and
in iron its ~ 15 times faster than in air.
Sound is a compression wave so in in any given medium there are 3 factors that affect the propagation speed ...
1) compressibility... 2) shear modulus and 3) density

edit: ... I should really mention that temperature also plays a part
cheers
Dave

Shear modulus does not really affect the speed of sound. Rather, it's pretty much exclusively determined by bulk modulus (compressive modulus) and density. Higher bulk modulus = higher sound speed, higher density = lower sound speed.
 
c=√(K/ρ)
Where k is bulk modulus and ρ is density in condensed matter
Ain't Maths a great language? An equation is worth a thousand words.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top